覆蓋範圍與來源

逐項統計的來源層級

Collections that carry a source on every entry

這四類條目每一項都有自己的 sourceId 或 sourceIds，所以可以逐項數出「有沒有非百科來源」。 「只靠百科」不是隱藏的分類：人物條目如果目前只有百科來源，本站在這裡照樣列出數目。

合計：逐項統計的 6945 條中，6596 條有一手或官方來源、147 條只靠百科、202 條未有逐項來源（主要為未逐項核對的職業清單條目）。

來源在集體或頁面層面聲明

Collections sourced as a whole, not entry by entry

以下集別的資料本身不是逐條「本站發現的事實」，而是官方名單或已公布清單的整理，所以來源在整份名單層面聲明， 逐條欄位標「—」而不會假裝有逐條來源。

來源登記冊

Source registry

• 官方登記：1130 個（sources.ts）official sources
• 文化／百科登記：1374 個（culturalSources），其中維基系 2 個cultural and encyclopaedic sources
• 已登記來源總數：2504total registered
• 本頁統計嘅集別共引用咗 1492 個來源；另有 1005 個已登記但未被引用（可能未接入或已淘汰）referenced by the collections listed here; registered but unreferenced
• 引用咗但未登記：0（有未知來源 id 會令建置失敗，唔會靜靜過關）referenced but not registered — should stay at zero

數字都有時點

Every figure carries a reference date

• 統計數字：938 / 938 項帶 asOf 時點sourced figures carrying an as-of date
• 歷史大事：242 / 242 項帶日期或年份historical milestones carrying a date or year

要留意口徑：十八區人口係「陸上非住院人口」，唔係年中人口估計；入境處國籍人數係某一日身在香港嘅點算，唔係居民總數。

問題與條目的連結

How the question set joins the entries — dead links are surfaced, not hidden

本站的問題條目（hkQuestions）每一條都手寫了「延伸頁面」，指向專題、分區或職業條目。這層關係不是裝飾： 建置時會用資料本身砌出一份路由白名單，逐條核對，任何指向不存在頁面的連結都會令建置失敗，所以下面的「死連結」應該恒為 0。

• 210 / 210 條問題帶有延伸頁面questions with at least one in-site link
• 600 條站內連結（未去重）in-site links written across the question set
• 34 / 46 個專題、4 / 18 個分區被問題引用過cited topics / districts
• 職業條目：0 / 400career entries cited — none yet; the question set cites the careers index instead (11 questions)

  現時 210 條問題只有 11 條連去《升學就業》目錄，未有一條連去個別職業條目， 所以這項顯示 0。寧願公開這個 0，也不會為了好看而補上沒有依據的關係；日後問題集擴充， 這組數字會隨資料自動更新。

• 指向不存在頁面的連結：0（零，審核腳本會持續守住）links to routes that do not exist — should stay at zero

以下條目被最多問題引用（按問題條數排序），可以視為搜尋意圖集中嘅入口：

問題文字、答案同引用數字見 /questions；每條問題嘅錨點格式為/questions#問題-slug，方便其他網站或模型直接引用單一條目。

年鑑逐頁、生活主頁、時間序列與每日自動更新

Year pages, everyday hubs, trend series and the daily pipeline

呢一節講清楚自動化做到咩、做唔到咩。可以自動嘅係：由官方 API 抓逐日數據再按固定規則點算、 抓新聞公報標題、跑覆蓋率審計。唔會自動嘅係：任何統計數字同任何條目文字——統計數字仍然只可以經 已核實嘅資料 人手加入，附來源同時點。

年鑑逐年頁

• 有頁年份：167（1841–2027，每年一頁 /yearbook/<年>）
• 已知缺口年份：20（未出頁，唔會用未核實資料填）
• 已核對事件：235 宗；當年數字：931 項
• 逐年頁每頁包含：嗰年大事、當年成立／開始嘅機構、當年數字、當年氣候（附歷年排名）、引用過嗰年數字嘅問題。

衣食住行生活主頁

時間序列（走勢圖）

• 官方／由官方逐日數據點算：42 條（天文台氣溫逐日序列、政府統計處互動統計表）； 需求量訊號：4 條（維基百科瀏覽量，只作需求參考，唔係統計）
• 抓取日：2026-11-07；每幅圖都寫明來源、點算規則同逐年數據表，機讀版本在/api/v1/series.json。

每日自動更新（官方新聞標題）

• 已收錄標題：1500 條（年份：2026），最後更新 2026-10-26
• 只收標題、連結、發布時間：內文、圖片一概唔收錄，版權屬香港特區政府新聞處； 標題係原文，唔代表本站立場，亦唔會進入統計表。
• 每日由 GitHub Actions 抓 → 跑審核 → 開 PR，人手合併先上線（唔會自動改統計數字）。

語言版本（如實申報）

• 中文（zh-HK）：全站所有頁面都係中文版，呢個係唯一完整版本。
• 英文（en）：只有 fact 層共 939 頁 （/en/facts 索引 ＋ 938 條/en/facts/<id>）。因為站內 fact 資料本身有 labelEn／valueEn，來源亦有 titleEn／publisherEn， 所以呢批英文頁係真翻譯，唔係機器翻譯，亦唔係中文頁改個標題。
• 其餘頁面（專題長文、深度專題、人物、學校、目錄……）冇英文版， 所以佢哋唔會申報 hreflang="en"。寧願只申報做得到嘅部分， 都唔好全站造假——呢條規則喺每次更新時逐頁逐頁高倍掃描比對。
• 英文頁之中有 196 條未有英文註釋（noteEn），嗰啲頁會明寫「No English note has been written for this figure yet」， 並連返中文頁，唔會靜靜留空。

搜尋意圖覆蓋率

• 意圖池：1104 條（目標 1000，仲差 0 條）； 已認領 940（85.1%）、可達 940（85.1%）
• 呢個數字每次更新自動重算，並且只升不跌：只可以升，唔可以跌 （跌就當更新失敗）。
• 快照日期 2026-10-18；未認領嘅意圖會自動列成工作清單，唔會當已經做咗。

Automated: daily figures from official APIs aggregated by a stated rule, press headlines, and coverage audits. Not automated: any statistic (facts must be added by hand with a source and reference date) and any entry prose.

《香港志》部類覆蓋

Hong Kong Chronicles — coverage measured against the announced 62-volume corpus

• 官方公布規模：十個部類，共 62 卷；另設專題志《香港賽馬會與社會發展志》；逾 2,000 萬字，2020–2027 分階段推出，預計 2027 年完成首輪編纂。Ten categories in 62 volumes plus one specialised-series volume, over 20 million characters, released in phases from 2020 with the first round of compilation due in 2027.
• 本站已上線：36501 條（已繫年 28783、未繫年 7718），另有 2553 條因合規紅線未上線； 官方已出版 7 / 62 卷（11%），而本站已抽取到 2 / 9 個部類。
• 《香港志》官方公布十個部類共 62 卷，其中 7 卷已出版、2 個部類已抽取上線（志錄 36501 條，另有 2553 條因合規紅線未上線）；其餘 55 卷（經濟、文化、社會、政治、人物、專記、附錄）官方尚未出版首批卷冊，一律顯示 0，唔會估算或改用二手轉述。The Chronicles comprise 62 volumes across ten categories; 7 are published and 2 categories are extracted and live here (36501 archived entries, with 2553 held back on compliance grounds). The remaining 55 volumes (Economy, Culture, Society, Politics, People (biographies), Special topics, Appendix) have no published instalment yet; they show 0 rather than an estimate or a second-hand paraphrase.
• 《香港志》電子書由香港地方志中心在其網站免費提供瀏覽（不分地域）；中心另設使用者登記制度，研究機構、學生或現職教研人員可填表申請電子書作研究或教學用途。The Institute makes the e-books free to read on its website with no regional restriction, and runs a user registration scheme under which research institutions, students and teaching staff may apply for e-books for research or teaching use.
• 1841 年開埠之前另設時間軸：/chronicle/ancient 分 9 個時代，列出已繫年 pre-1841 條目 677 條（橫跨 262 個年份頁，最早公元 25 年）同原文只有時代標籤嘅條目 1429 條（其中明確公元前年份 36 條，公元前 5000 年 – 公元前 106 年）——公元前年份一律照原文，唔換算、唔補寫年份。呢啲數字 即時派生自志錄，可以逐項核對。Before 1841 the site keeps a separate timeline: /chronicle/ancient splits 9 eras, listing 677 dated pre-1841 entries across 262 year pages (earliest AD 25) plus 1429 entries whose source gives a period label only — 36 of them with an explicit BC year (公元前 5000 年 – 公元前 106 年). BC years are reproduced exactly as printed, never converted or filled in. Every figure is derived live from the archive and is never hand-entered.
• 本表由官方目錄逐卷對照即時點算：每條條目嘅來源編號都會同官方部類對上；新卷冊一上線，數字即刻跟住變，未到手嘅部類一律顯示 0。

「官方專題文章」一欄係香港地方志中心自己嘅文章書目索引（標題、連結、部類標籤，共 226 條）：內文同圖片一概唔收（版權屬中心），亦唔會當成《香港志》內容或任何統計。 未出版部類嘅落地內容見 /chronicle/articles。The “official articles” column counts titles only (bibliographic index, 226 entries) — no article text or images, and never treated as Chronicles content or as a statistic.

Volumes published per category come from the Institute’s own publication pages; entry counts are computed live from the archive. Nothing unpublished is paraphrased, approximated or filled in from secondary sources.

已知缺口清單（15 項）

以下資料官方只有 PDF／新聞稿或者動態網頁，冇機器可讀版本；依本站規矩唔會抄成統計數字， 只會喺 /api/v1/gaps.json 同呢度公開原因同官方入口。

• 公屋平均輪候時間（歷史序列） Average waiting time for public rental housing (historical series)
  房屋局只以季刊及新聞稿公布，冇機器可讀嘅歷史表；站內只有最新時點數字，未有可重推序列。
  官方入口：https://www.hb.gov.hk/
• 空氣污染物年均濃度 Annual mean air pollutant concentrations
  環保署公開數據只有即時及過去二十四小時嘅空氣質素指數，年度監測報告係 PDF，冇機器可讀年表。
  官方入口：https://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/english/environmentinhk/air/air_main.html
• 電費與煤氣費（歷史平均水平） Electricity and gas tariffs (historical averages)
  電價同煤氣費由兩間電力公司及煤氣公司各自公布，口徑分「基本電價／燃料調整費／淨電價」，未有一份官方機器可讀歷史表。
  官方入口：https://www.emsd.gov.hk/
• 公共交通乘客量（歷史序列） Public transport patronage (historical series)
  運輸署以年報及專題文章公布，站內未取得可重推嘅年度機器可讀序列；只有最新時點數字。
  官方入口：https://www.td.gov.hk/
• 醫管局急症室及專科門診輪候（完整序列） Hospital Authority A&E and specialist waiting times (full series)
  統計處互動表只有少數年度點；其餘輪候數字見醫管局網頁及年報（PDF／HTML），未有完整機器可讀序列。
  官方入口：https://www.ha.org.hk/
• 志錄：未上線待覆核條目 Chronicle entries withheld pending review
  呢批條目未通過「與官方書頁連續重疊」嘅合規紅線（或屬口語轉述），依規矩唔可以上線；數量同分類見缺口出口即場派生，唔會在站內發布其內容。
  官方入口：https://www.hkchronicles.org.hk/
• 居屋與綠置居屋苑名錄 HOS and GSH court directory
  房屋委員會公開數據只有租住屋邨名錄；居屋／綠置居只有逐次銷售嘅成交資料，冇逐個屋苑嘅機器可讀名錄，所以本站只列租住屋邨，居屋部分照實留缺口。
  官方入口：https://www.housingauthority.gov.hk/
• 薪俸稅稅階與免稅額 Salaries tax bands and allowances
  稅務局以網頁及 PDF 公布每個課稅年度嘅稅階、免稅額同標準稅率，冇逐個年度嘅機器可讀表；本站只列稅收總額等已登記數字，唔會自製稅階表或個人計稅器。
  官方入口：https://www.ird.gov.hk/
• 學生資助計劃清單 Student finance schemes
  在職家庭及學生資助事務處以網頁公布各項資助計劃嘅對象同申請安排，冇機器可讀嘅計劃登記冊；本站唔會逐項抄寫條件或估算資格。
  官方入口：https://www.wfsfaa.gov.hk/
• 資助安老院舍名錄 Subsidised residential care homes
  社會福利署以網頁及 PDF 公布資助院舍名單同宿位安排，冇逐間院舍嘅機器可讀名錄；本站只保留安老服務總數等已登記數字，唔會把私營院舍廣告當名錄。
  官方入口：https://www.swd.gov.hk/
• 來港入境計劃清單 Immigration schemes for coming to Hong Kong
  入境事務處以網頁公布各項入境計劃（優才、高才、輸入內地人才、工作、受養人等）嘅對象同要求，冇機器可讀嘅計劃登記冊；本站唔會寫攻略或估算獲批機會。
  官方入口：https://www.immd.gov.hk/
• 法定專業年底持牌人數 Year-end licensed practitioner counts for statutory professions
  會計師、地產代理、保險中介、社工、建築師等法定專業嘅年底持牌人數，分散喺各監管機構年報（PDF／HTML），冇一份合併嘅機器可讀表；本站唔會逐個年報抄數。
  官方入口：https://www.hkicpa.org.hk/
• 食物安全中心事故與回收公告索引 CFS food incident and recall notice index
  食物安全中心逐次以網頁公布事故同回收，冇機器可讀嘅歷史索引；本站唔會抄寫公告內容，亦唔會評價邊間店安全。
  官方入口：https://www.cfs.gov.hk/
• 專營巴士逐線載客量 Per-route patronage of franchised buses
  路線清冊（路線號、起訖、車費、行車時間）已由運輸署官方 XML 收錄；但逐線載客量只散見於各營辦商年報同立法會文件，冇合併嘅機器可讀表，所以本站唔會逐份年報抄數。
  官方入口：https://www.td.gov.hk/
• 香港文學獎項得主名單 Winner lists of Hong Kong literary awards
  官方文學獎項（例如香港中文文學雙年獎、香港藝術發展獎文學組別）嘅得獎名單以動態網頁或出版物發布，冇機器可讀清單；依規矩本站唔會轉載未經機器核對嘅名單，亦唔會自行評選「最出色作品」，只喺文學頁公開缺口。
  官方入口：https://www.hkadc.org.hk/explore/promotion/hong-kong-arts-development-awards

逐項官方名錄（八個）

以下八份名錄全部由官方開放數據或官方圖層逐項派生，每份都有離線可重推嘅閘； 條數即場由資料檔點算，唔係手寫。

• 公共屋邨名錄：245 條（房屋委員會）
• 已評級歷史建築：1182 幢（古物古蹟辦事處）
• 遠足徑分段：167 段（漁護署）
• 公眾泳池：45 個（康文署）
• 公眾泳灘：42 個（其中 11 個有本週水質公布）
• 燒烤場：200 個（漁護署＋康文署）
• 露營地：41 個（漁護署）
• 出入境管制站：16 個（入境事務處）

來源譜系 / Source ledger

志錄共 36501 條條目（已繫年 28783、未繫年 7718、 待覆核未上線 2553），逐條只有一個第一來源； 合共 5 個來源，出自 1 間官方出版機構（香港地方志中心）。官方目錄共 62 卷，當中 7 卷已出版（全部已抽取）， 其餘 55 卷未出版，一律顯示為零。

呢啲數唔係估算：冇來源欄位嘅條目 0 條；逐條第二來源欄位唔存在（已填寫 0 條）。 One primary source per entry; 5 sources from 1 publisher(s); 7 of 62 catalogue volumes published, the remaining 55 reported as zero. Entries without a source field: 0.

• 志錄每一條只登記一個第一來源（官方出版刊物本身），冇第二來源欄位：呢一層係「一條條目、一個出處」，唔係「一宗事件、多方對照」。
  Each archive entry registers exactly one primary source — the official publication itself — with no second-source field: one entry, one citation, rather than one event read through several accounts.
• 全部志錄條目都出自同一間官方地方志出版機構已出版嘅卷冊。呢個係事實，唔係評價：官方目錄嘅卷冊大部分仍未出版，未出版嘅部分一律顯示為零，唔會用二手轉述、估算或者關鍵詞比對補上。
  Every archive entry comes from volumes already published by one official local-history publisher. That is a fact, not a judgement: most volumes in the official catalogue remain unpublished, and unpublished material is reported as zero — never filled in from secondary paraphrase, estimates or keyword matching.
• 「官方只出咗少數卷冊」同「本站未建立跨來源交叉」係兩件唔同嘅事，兩者都要照實講：前者係出版現實，後者係本站已知缺口。
  “Only a few volumes are published” and “this site has not yet built cross-source checking” are two different things and both are stated: the first is a publishing reality, the second a known gap of this site.
• 同一批官方一手來源之間已經有交叉對照機制（地質年代對《香港地質導賞書》、同名指標嘅兩套官方口徑、公共領域古籍書目、遠古官方新增條目），逐項覆蓋率見「交叉對照」一節。
  Cross-checking already exists between official primary sources (geological periods against the Hong Kong Geology Guide Book, measures that have two official bases, public-domain gazetteer bibliographic data, and the ancient-period official additions); per-item coverage is listed in the cross-check section.
• 待覆核條目（與原文重疊過多或有口語風險者）唔會出現喺任何統計，亦唔會計入來源譜系。
  Entries still withheld from publication (verbatim-overlap or colloquial risk) appear in no statistic and are excluded from the ledger.

三層「有欄位、未開始」嘅實情

• 媒體文獻索引（報紙名、日期、版面座標）已有欄位，但目前未有一條條目填過，所以本站冇任何報紙版面或影音座標可以指。
  The media-reference field (newspaper name, date, page) exists as a field but no entry carries a value yet, so this site can point to no newspaper page or audiovisual item.
• 志錄條目本身冇逐條區議會分區歸屬：有地方名唔等於已歸區，所以呢一層唔會把「有地名」條目假裝成已連到十八區。
  Archive entries carry no per-entry District Council area: a place name is not the same as an assigned district, so entries with a place name are not presented as linked to the eighteen districts.
• 本站冇任何結構化座標資料（經緯度），所以唔會畫地圖；要畫就要另開一個有來源同授權記錄嘅資料批次，唔會憑地名推座標。
  This site holds no structured coordinates, so no map is drawn; a map would need a separate sourced batch with recorded licensing, and coordinates will not be inferred from place names.

數字對照：有地方名嘅志錄條目 35603 條、去重後地名 2915 個， 但逐條區議會分區歸屬 0 條 （分區總數 18）；已核大事則有 331 條帶歸屬。 所以十八區頁嘅時間線只覆蓋已核大事，唔會假裝覆蓋志錄全量。 已核大事背景敘事 479 條（大事總數 497）； 媒體文獻索引有值嘅條目 0 條。 35603 entries carry a place name and 2915 distinct names appear, but 0 entries carry a District Council area, so the 18 district timelines cover the checked milestones (331 of 497) only. Narratives: 479; entries with a media reference: 0.

機器可讀：/api/v1/archive.json 嘅 provenance 段。

交叉對照 / Cross-checking

同一批官方一手來源之間，本站已經有 6 套交叉對照機制；逐項覆蓋率如下。 「已對照」係指對照到官方另一份文本（例如地質年代對官方導賞書），唔係引入民間敘述。

• 地質年代 × 官方導賞書：志錄每一個帶時期標籤嘅地質條目，逐條同《香港地質導賞書》對照：命中同一岩組單位＝單位級；只配對到時期標籤＝紀級。 限制：紀級只證明「同一時期」，唔證明同一件事；配唔上嘅一律登記原因，唔會硬配。
  Every period-labelled geological entry is matched against the Hong Kong Geology Guide Book: the same rock unit counts as unit level; a match on the period label alone counts as period level. Limit: A period-level match proves the same period, not the same event; unmatched entries carry a registered reason and are never force-matched.
• 同名指標 × 兩套官方口徑：同一個名嘅數字若有兩套官方口徑，逐組登記兩邊 fact、範圍同「唔可以相加／互換」嘅理由。 限制：只做到兩邊都有官方 fact 嘅組；單邊嘅照樣登記並寫明缺口，唔准估一個數補上。
  Where one measure has two official bases, each group registers both facts, their scope, and why they must not be added or swapped. Limit: Only groups whose two sides both exist as official facts are complete; one-sided groups are still registered with the gap stated, never filled in with a guess.
• 公共領域古籍 × 掃描本授權：每一部登記嘅古籍掃描本都要有版本、藏本、授權（必須公共領域）同檔案指紋，唔只係書名。 限制：書目完整唔等於內容已核：由掃描本人手核讀嘅內容事實另計，並附頁碼同檔案指紋。
  Every registered gazetteer scan needs an edition, holding library, rights status (public domain required) and file fingerprint — not just a title. Limit: A complete bibliography is not verified content: facts hand-read from a scan are counted separately, each with page number and file fingerprint.
• 遠古時期 × 官方一手新增：開埠（英軍登陸）之前嘅條目，除志錄之外另收官方公布同公共領域古籍，逐條分清官方／書目／古籍內容三類。 限制：古籍內容一律人手核讀後先入庫，自動 OCR 輸出永遠唔會直接入庫。
  For entries before the colonial opening, sources include official announcements and public-domain gazetteers alongside the archive, split into official, bibliographic and gazetteer-content kinds. Limit: Gazetteer content is added only after hand-reading; automated OCR output never enters the dataset directly.
• 未出版部類 × 官方專題文章索引：未出版部類嘅唯一合規落地內容：官方專題文章嘅標題、連結同部類標籤。 限制：只列標題同連結，唔收內文同圖片，亦唔會當成官方卷冊內容或者任何統計。
  The only compliant landing content for unpublished categories: titles, links and category labels of the Institute’s own articles. Limit: Titles and links only — no article text or images, and never treated as volume content or as a statistic.
• 志錄來源 × 官方已出版卷冊：志錄條目全部出自官方已出版卷冊，逐冊登記條數、頁碼範圍同涉及標籤；官方目錄嘅總卷數另計。 限制：未出版卷冊一律顯示為零：既唔會用二手描述補位，亦唔會把「官方未出」講成「歷史冇記」。
  Every archive entry comes from a published official volume; each volume registers its entry count, page range and tags, with the catalogue total counted separately. Limit: Unpublished volumes are shown as zero: never filled in from second-hand description, and never presented as if the history had gone unrecorded.

跨來源最薄嘅地方

標籤共 50 個：只由一冊書支撐 2 個、兩冊 11 個、 三冊或以上 32 個。只由一冊書支撐嘅標籤照實列出：選舉（191 條）、知識產權（9 條）。呢啲標籤唔會因為薄而唔顯示，亦唔會用二手資料加厚。

• 本站嘅「多源」只可以係官方一手之間嘅交叉：唔准搬字、唔准二手轉述、唔准用維基內容補位（維基只作需求訊號）。
  Cross-checking here means cross-checking between official primary sources: no lifted wording, no second-hand paraphrase, and no filling in from Wikipedia (used only as a demand signal).
• 「未對照」唔等於「錯」：只係表示同一件事本站暫時只有一個官方出處。呢種情況一律照實標示單一來源，唔會靠估補第二個。
  “Not cross-checked” does not mean wrong: it means this site currently has one official citation for the matter. Such cases are labelled single-source rather than padded with a second, guessed citation.
• 加新對照機制嘅次序係「先登記規則同頁碼證據、再由閘機械重推、最後人手裁決」；唔准自動配對入庫。
  Adding a new cross-check follows the order of registering the rule and page evidence, letting a gate recompute it mechanically, and then deciding by hand; automatic matching never enters the dataset.

來源多樣性：邊部分只靠一本書 / Source diversity

志錄 36501 條、主要來源 5 冊，但全部出自1 間出版機構（香港地方志中心）， 而逐條第二來源欄位仍未建立（填入第二來源嘅條目 0 條）。 所以「多來源」現階段只係指多冊之間嘅分佈——呢頁就係逐冊、逐十年攤開出嚟，等讀者自己判斷依賴有幾集中。

逐冊依賴度

逐個十年：佔比最大嘅一冊

佔比係「該冊喺呢個十年嘅條目 ÷ 呢個十年全部條目」。佔比高唔代表有問題，但代表該冊嘅收錄取向會主導呢個十年。

只靠一冊嘅十年：0 個——即係每個十年都至少有一冊以上，但全部仍屬同一間出版機構。

四條聲明

• 志錄每一條只有一個主要來源（官方卷冊），未建立逐條第二來源欄位；所以「多來源」現階段只係指多冊之間嘅分佈，唔係同一件事有兩份獨立文件互證。
  Every archive entry currently carries one primary source (an official volume) and no per-entry second-source field, so "multiple sources" here means distribution across volumes, not two independent documents about the same event.
• 單一來源唔等於偏頗，但依賴集中係一個要講出嚟嘅風險：如果某個十年全部條目都出自同一冊，該冊嘅收錄取向就會沿住成個十年擴散。呢頁逐個十年標出嚟，唔會用平均值遮住。
  A single source is not automatically biased, but concentration is a risk worth stating: if one volume supplies a whole decade, that volume’s selection bias travels with every entry. Each decade is flagged here rather than hidden behind an average.
• 補第二來源嘅次序：先用官方一手文件（政府新聞公報、立法會文件、憲報、檔案目錄），再考慮官方統計；唔會用維基、內容農場或商業資料庫補位。第二來源要逐字對得上，對唔上就唔加。
  Second sources are added in this order: official first-hand documents (press releases, Legislative Council papers, the Gazette, archival catalogues), then official statistics. Wikis, content farms and commercial databases are never used to fill a gap, and a second source is only added when its wording matches.
• 「未做」照寫「未做」：呢頁列嘅工作清單全部係未開始或者進行中，冇一項可以當成已完成嘅交叉核對。核對完嘅部分會喺「交叉對照」一節逐項列出。
  Work not done is labelled as such: everything in the worklist below is not started or in progress, and none of it counts as completed cross-checking. Whatever has been cross-checked appears item by item in the cross-check section above.

補第二來源嘅工作清單（全部未完成）

• 為志錄條目建立第二來源欄位 / Add a second-source field to archive entries
  先由有官方新聞公報或立法會文件可以逐字對照嘅年代開始，對得上才填；對唔上就留空。
  Start with periods that have verbatim press releases or LegCo papers; fill only where wording matches, otherwise leave blank.
  狀態：未開始 / Not started
• 憲報同附屬法例逐條對照 / Check the Gazette and subsidiary legislation entry by entry
  涉及法例生效日期嘅條目，可以用電子版法例同憲報核對日期；核對完才改條目。
  Entries that hinge on commencement dates can be checked against e-Legislation and the Gazette; entries change only after checking.
  狀態：未開始 / Not started
• 條目內文數字對官方統計 / Match in-text figures to official statistics
  志錄條目提到嘅人口、船隻、工廠等數字，部分有官方統計可對；對得上才另外立 fact。
  Some figures quoted in entries (population, vessels, factories) have official statistics behind them; a fact is created only when the match holds.
  狀態：未開始 / Not started
• 古蹟同地圖嘅官方名錄對照 / Cross-check monuments and maps against official registers
  涉及建築物、地段嘅條目，可以用古物古蹟辦事處名錄同圖書館舊地圖核對位置。
  Entries about buildings and lots can be checked against the Antiquities and Monuments Office register and old maps held by the public libraries.
  狀態：未開始 / Not started

工作清單會用到嘅官方入口：政府檔案處 · 立法會 · 香港公共圖書館多媒體資訊系統 · 古物古蹟辦事處 · 政府新聞公報 · 政府統計處 · 電子版香港法例。呢批入口只係路標，唔會當成本站引用來源。

三個缺口

• 逐條第二來源欄位未建立：志錄條目冇第二來源欄，所以「同一件事官方有冇另一個講法」目前無法機械檢示。
  No per-entry second-source field exists yet, so whether an event has a second official account cannot be checked mechanically.
• 未出版卷冊所屬年份冇條目，屬收錄缺口而唔係「當年冇事發生」；呢個缺口唔會用其他材料補。
  Years covered only by unpublished volumes have no entries; that is a coverage gap, not evidence that nothing happened, and it is not filled from other material.
• 第二來源嘅「逐字對得上」需要人手核讀，未有任何自動光學辨識或語意比對結果入庫。
  Verbatim matching of a second source requires manual reading; no automatic OCR or semantic comparison result is admitted.

自行核證入口 / Where to check for yourself

官方一手檔案／資料庫共 11 個入口。呢批入口只係路標， 唔係本站嘅引用來源；本站嘅引用一律由已登記來源派生。想核對「同一件事官方仲有冇另一個講法」， 就由呢度自己去查。

檔案 / Archives

• 政府檔案處 香港特別行政區政府 · Government Records Service
  查政府部門檔案嘅存廢、移交同可查閱目錄，係核對官方文書原文嘅第一站。
  Search the disposition, transfer and public-access records of government files — the first stop for checking official documents themselves.
  本站唔會取：本站唔會複製檔案影像或逐頁轉述；檔案內容唔會進入任何統計或條目內文。
• 立法會 立法會秘書處 · Legislative Council
  查會議紀錄、法案委員會文件同歷史檔案，用嚟核對立法同政策時序。
  Search council minutes, bills committee papers and historical records to check the sequence of legislation and policy.
  本站唔會取：本站唔會搬字；會議發言同文件內容只可以喺原站閱讀。

公報 / Gazettes

• 政府新聞公報 香港特別行政區政府新聞處 · Government Press Releases
  查官方公布原文同發布日期；本站只收標題、連結同發布時間。
  Read official announcements and their issue dates; this site collects titles, links and issue times only.
  本站唔會取：本站唔會收公報內文或圖片（版權屬新聞處），新聞標題亦唔會進入任何統計。

官方統計 / Official statistics

• 香港天文台 香港天文台 · Hong Kong Observatory
  查逐日氣溫、警告紀錄同氣候統計，用嚟核對本站氣溫序列同警告條目。
  Check daily temperatures, warning records and climate statistics to verify the temperature series and warning entries here.
  本站唔會取：本站只按固定規則點算官方讀數，唔會自行插補缺測日期或者改寫警告定義。
• 政府統計處 香港特別行政區政府 · Census and Statistics Department
  查人口、住戶、勞動人口等官方統計同各期刊物嘅口徑定義。
  Check official population, household and labour statistics, and the definitional base of each release.
  本站唔會取：本站唔會把兩套口徑相加或互換；同時有兩套官方數嘅指標一律登記入口徑層。

法例 / Legislation

• 電子版香港法例 律政司 · Hong Kong e-Legislation
  查法例全文、修訂紀錄同生效日期。
  Read the full text of ordinances, amendment records and commencement dates.
  本站唔會取：本站唔會改寫法例全名（一律入「引用名稱」），亦唔會把條文縮寫成敘述。

文物名錄 / Heritage lists

• 古物古蹟辦事處 發展局 · Antiquities and Monuments Office
  查法定古蹟、已評級歷史建築嘅官方名錄同公布日期。
  Check the official lists and declaration dates of monuments and graded historic buildings.
  本站唔會取：本站唔會自行評級或推斷未公布嘅文物價值；名錄以外嘅建築唔會當成古蹟。

圖書館典藏 / Library collections

• 香港記憶 香港特別行政區政府 · Hong Kong Memory
  查舊照片、舊報紙、口述歷史等數碼典藏嘅條目同授權狀態。
  Browse digitised photographs, old newspapers and oral-history items together with their rights statements.
  本站唔會取：本站唔會下載或轉載典藏影像；要引用就請直接引用該典藏同佢自己嘅授權條款。
• 香港公共圖書館多媒體資訊系統 康樂及文化事務署 · Hong Kong Public Libraries Multimedia Information System
  查數碼化舊報紙、政府刊物同照片，適合核對舊新聞標題同日後報導。
  Search digitised historical newspapers, government publications and photographs to check old headlines and later reporting.
  本站唔會取：本站唔會抓取或重刊報紙內容；新聞標題只喺官方新聞公報層面收錄（見來源登記冊）。

出版機構 / Publisher

• 香港地方志中心 香港地方志中心 · Hong Kong Chronicles Institute
  查官方《香港志》各卷嘅出版狀態、目錄同專題文章索引。
  Check the publication status, tables of contents and article index of each official volume.
  本站唔會取：本站只抽取原子事實（每條附原書檔名同頁碼），唔會轉載原書文字；未出版部類唔會用二手描述補上。

掃描本檔案頁 / Scan file pages

• 維基媒體共享資源 維基媒體基金會 · Wikimedia Commons
  查公共領域古籍掃描本嘅檔案頁、授權聲明同檔案指紋，用嚟核對本站登記嘅掃描本來源。
  Check file pages, rights statements and file fingerprints of public-domain gazetteer scans, to verify the scans this site registers.
  本站唔會取：本站只登記書目同檔案指紋，唔會下載掃描檔或把掃描影像上線；內容一律以人手核讀後嘅事實為限。

• 呢批入口係「去邊度自己查」，唔係「本站引用咗呢啲來源」：本站嘅引用一律由已登記來源派生。
  These portals say where to look things up yourself; they are not sources this site cites. Citations here are derived only from registered sources.
• 每一項都唔需要登入或者付費就可以查到目錄級資料；要閱覽原件或影像，請依各機構自己嘅閱覽規則同授權條款。
  Every entry offers catalogue-level access without login or payment; viewing originals or images follows each institution’s own access rules and licence terms.
• 本站唔會因為某項資料喺呢啲入口搵得到，就把它寫入條目或者統計；入口存在唔等於內容已核實。
  Material being findable at these portals does not put it into an entry or a statistic here; a portal existing is not verification.

已知缺口

Known gaps — stated, not hidden

• gap-1法定古蹟 140 項已逐項收錄宣布日期同背景說明（見 /heritage）；地址、開放時間同收費未列於本站，須查各古蹟管理機構嘅公布。
  All 140 declared monuments carry a declaration date and a researched background note (see /heritage); addresses, opening hours and admission fees are not listed here and follow the managing body’s own publication.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-2「已評級歷史建築」（一至三級）已收錄一級代表性子集；完整一至三級名單（過千項）尚未逐項核對。
  A representative Grade I subset of graded historic buildings is covered; the full Grades I–III list (1,000+ items) is not yet itemised.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-3黃大仙、觀塘、葵青三區官方名單內未有法定古蹟，名錄如實顯示 0。
  Wong Tai Sin, Kwun Tong and Kwai Tsing have no declared monument in the official list; the register shows 0 rather than omitting them.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-4私人機構薪酬：只有官方薪級表、條例或監管機構公布嘅數字才寫；其餘一律留白。
  Private-sector pay is written only where an official pay scale, ordinance or regulator publishes it; otherwise it is left blank.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-5部分熱門問題（例如現行急症室收費、公屋平均輪候時間）未核對到官方數字，一律留白並指明官方出處。
  Some popular questions (for example current A&E charges or average public rental housing waiting time) are left blank with the official source named, until verified.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-6學校名錄並非全港學校總數；人物條目嘅來源層級亦唔一致（見上表）。
  The school register is not the territory-wide school count, and source tiers across biographies are uneven (see the table above).
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-7當季盛事、節慶活動同「18區打卡熱點」（如旅發局 discoverhongkong 及民政事務總署 gohk 推廣嘅活動）屬即時／季節性推廣，本站不追蹤即時活動，亦不作統計來源。
  Seasonal events, festivals and “check-in hotspots” promoted on HKTB’s Discover Hong Kong and HAD’s Go 18 Districts are immediate and promotional; this site does not track live events and treats them as non-statistical.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-8旅遊推廣同民間保育機構嘅景點詮釋（旅發局五大景點分類、民間口述史書刊）只作延伸閱讀參考，唔當官方統計；詳細景點開放安排同收費由官方各景點網站公布。
  Tourism-promotion and NGO site interpretations (such as HKTB’s five-way attraction classification or folk oral-history books) are further-reading only, not official statistics; opening hours and fees follow each official attraction site.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-9《香港志》志錄只上線通過合規改寫嘅原子事實，現時 36501 條（其中 7718 條原文無西曆年份，只入未繫年清單、冇年份頁）；另有 2553 條因與原文連續重疊 ≥ 12 字（2507 條）或有口語字（46 條）而一律唔上線，未完成覆核前唔會出現喺任何統計或頁面。其中一小批 1989 年政治事件條目（六四事件、支聯會成立、民主歌聲獻中華演唱會、燭光晚會等）嘅合規改寫一直無法由本站嘅自動改寫管線產出（改寫模型每次拒絕，原句同書頁照樣可核），本站照樣列作未收錄，唔會改用其他來源，亦唔會寫成失真版本補位。
  The Hong Kong Chronicles archive publishes only atomic facts that passed the compliance rewrite: 36501 so far, of which 7718 carry no Gregorian year in the source and therefore appear only in the undated list, with no year page. A further 2553 facts remain unpublished because they still overlap the source by 12+ consecutive characters (2507) or contain colloquial wording (46); they appear in no statistic or page until reviewed. A small group of 1989 political-event facts (the June Fourth events, the founding of the Alliance in Support of the Patriotic Democratic Movement, the “democracy songs” concert, the candlelight vigil) has never been rewritten into compliance by this site’s automated pipeline — the rewriting model declines them every time, though the statements and source pages remain checkable — so they stay withheld: this site substitutes no other source and publishes no distorted version.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-10《香港志》官方公布十個部類共 62 卷，其中 7 卷已出版、2 個部類已抽取上線（志錄 36501 條，另有 2553 條因合規紅線未上線）；其餘 55 卷（經濟、文化、社會、政治、人物、專記、附錄）官方尚未出版首批卷冊，一律顯示 0，唔會估算或改用二手轉述。公元前年份同朝代／年號標籤（例如「公元前 214 年」「明天順年間」）而家有入口：一律照原文列於 /chronicle/ancient，唔會換算做西曆年，亦唔會為佢哋虛構年份頁。現時 677 條 pre-1841 已繫年條目分佈於 262 個年份頁（最早公元 25 年），另有 1429 條只有原文時代標籤（其中 36 條有明確公元前年份，範圍公元前 5000 年 – 公元前 106 年）。
  The Chronicles comprise 62 volumes across ten categories; 7 are published and 2 categories are extracted and live here (36501 archived entries, with 2553 held back on compliance grounds). The remaining 55 volumes (Economy, Culture, Society, Politics, People (biographies), Special topics, Appendix) have no published instalment yet; they show 0 rather than an estimate or a second-hand paraphrase. BC years and dynasty or reign labels (for example “214 BC” or “the Tianshun era of the Ming”) now have a home: they are listed verbatim on /chronicle/ancient, never converted into Gregorian years and never given invented year pages. Today 677 pre-1841 dated entries sit on 262 year pages (earliest AD 25), and a further 1429 entries carry only a source period label — 36 of them with an explicit BC year (公元前 5000 年 – 公元前 106 年).
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-11未繫年清單仲有 6289 條原文冇可對應時代嘅時間標籤（完全冇寫時間 6046 條、只寫季節／月份 243 條）：佢哋一律只喺未繫年分頁出現，唔會硬塞入遠古時間軸。地質年代一節嘅 306 條志錄條目全部由同一份志錄抽取，所以而家逐條配第二來源：306 條之中 128 條對得上土力工程處《香港地質導賞書》（2007）有專章嘅同一地層單位、113 條只對得上同一地質紀（導賞書有專章專點，標籤級配對、唔當同一岩組），其餘 65 條導賞書冇同類記載——係因為地層喺香港境外、或香港近乎冇嗰個紀嘅已出露地層（前中生代、三疊紀）、或條目講嘅係區域構造而唔係出露岩層，唔會硬配一個似係嘅章節。呢啲逐條對照同判定級別喺 /chronicle/ancient/geological 可以逐條睇；每次更新都會自動核對，唔會靜靜失效。另外時代簡介提到嘅四個地質紀（泥盆紀、石炭紀、侏羅紀、白堊紀）各有一條官方來源里程碑（導賞書同發展局 2024 年赤洲恐龍化石公布，共 4 條）。
  The undated listing still holds 6289 entries whose source carries no era-mappable time label (6046 with no time reference at all, 243 giving only a season or month); they stay there rather than being forced onto the ancient timeline. All 306 geological archive entries come from the same Chronicles volumes, so each now carries a second source: of 306, 128 match the same rock unit that has its own chapter in the GEO/CEDD Hong Kong Geology Guide Book (2007), 113 match only the same geological period the Guide covers (a label-level match, never presented as the same rock unit), and 65 have no counterpart in the Guide — either because the rocks lie outside Hong Kong, because Hong Kong has virtually no exposed strata of that period (pre-Mesozoic, Triassic), or because the entry concerns a regional structure rather than exposed rock, and no lookalike chapter is assigned. The per-entry matching and its level are shown entry by entry on /chronicle/ancient/geological, and every update checks it automatically, so it cannot lapse quietly. The era page also carries 4 official milestones from second sources covering each period named in the era introduction — Devonian, Carboniferous, Jurassic and Cretaceous (the Guide and the Development Bureau’s 2024 Port Island dinosaur-fossil announcement).
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-12公共領域古籍掃描本現時 5 個（《粵大記》同《新安縣志》各版本），登記書目／版本資料同 Commons 標示嘅授權（逐次經 Commons API 核 rights、保留 sha1）。掃描本自身冇可用文字層（實測抽出嚟係字形編號、冇 ToUnicode），自動 OCR（macOS Vision，實測 176 頁）字元錯誤率太高，一律唔會直接入庫；現時有 41 條內容事實經人手核讀、同志錄對照後上線（康熙《新安縣志》「官富山」條，對照志錄 1277 年官富場條目；嘉慶《新安縣志》「都里」本籍同客籍村莊名單（本籍名單有一段專列香港島、九龍、沙田各村：香港村、黃泥涌、薄鳧林、掃管莆、衙前村、尖沙頭、芒角村、深水莆；客籍名單嘅「官富司管屬客籍村莊 附」段六葉（掃描本第 63 至 65 頁）亦已整段核讀，192 個村名同志錄所記官富司客籍 194 條只差 2 條——沙頭角嘅烏蛟田、荔枝窩、鎖腦盤、谷埠、榕樹凹、鹽竈下、南涌圍、七木橋、鹿頸、担水坑、蓮麻坑、麻雀嶺、萬屋邊，大埔嘅碗窰、社山、沙螺洞、樟樹灘、梧桐寨、大菴，荃灣／葵涌／青衣嘅城門、穿龍、淺灣、葵涌子、青衣、油甘頭、花山、響石，西貢嘅白沙澳、井欄樹、沙角尾、上洋、檳榔灣、孟公屋，同沙田九肚）、同卷「福永司管屬村莊」同「福永司管屬客籍村莊 附」兩段（掃描本第 65 頁下葉至第 68 頁下葉）亦已整段核讀：本籍 154 名、客籍 31 名，同志錄所記福永司本籍 154／客籍 31 完全吻合；段末跋語記舊志鄉三、都七、圖五十有七、村將及五百，並記「現查本籍村莊五百七十有奇、客籍村莊二百七十有奇，分隸於縣丞、典史兩巡檢屬下」；該段可辨認嘅村名全部落在今深圳（寶安沙井、衙邊、固戍、懷德、黃田、新橋、上寮、長圳，光明樓村、田尾、西田、薯田，石岩官田、羅租，龍華洪田，南山白芒），冇一條可以斷定係今日香港村落——今日香港嘅屯門、龍鼓灘、掃管笏等村名並唔喺福永司段，要喺官富司本籍段或縣丞、典史兩段搵、「海防畧」卷同凡例自述編纂，對照志錄 1819 年官富司轄村條目；同嘉慶志卷之十二 海防畧「防海形勢」門正文（南頭寨原轄汛地六處：佛堂門、龍船灣、洛格、大澳、浪淘灣、浪白；大嶼山雞翼角砲臺、南頭砲臺、赤灣左右砲臺；明隆慶五年康壽柏協守大鵬所城、國朝順治四年陳耀破大鵬城；尹瑾海防八事疏）同「寨船」門（南頭寨戰船五十三艘至四十八隻、新安營同大鵬營米艇、撈繒船）——分別對照志錄 1563 年六座水師寨（其中佛堂門、龍船灣、大澳、浪淘灣四處喺今香港境內、每處駐兵逾二百名）、1540 年三路巡海、1630 年同 1633–1635 年李魁奇同劉香犯新安、1682 年屯門寨同四汛、1729 年雞翼角炮台、1646／1647／1656 年陳耀劫掠同李萬榮、黃應傑圍大鵬山嘅條目；同嘉慶志卷之十三 防省志三門——「遷復」記康熙元年遷界同年八年復界、「災異」記嘉慶十二年九龍同蠔涌落雹擊死牛畜同乾隆至嘉慶逐年天災，另有明代嘉靖至崇禎、清初順治至康熙兩段逐年災異（地震、彗星、旱饑、米價、疫症、颶風大水；康熙元年潮大溢「是年移村」、八年「是年復村」係遷界復界嘅側證；門末附註「已上見舊志」劃出照錄康熙本舊志嘅來源界線）、「寇盜」記正德十一年佛郎機人佔據屯門海澳——分別對照志錄 1662／1669／1807／1516 年嘅遷界復界、災異同屯門海戰條目）。同卷【官富司管屬村莊】標目所在嘅第 59 頁上下兩葉（官富司本籍段開頭兩葉）亦已逐葉核讀：上葉右半由右數第 2 欄就係標目本身，標目之後右半 14 名、左半 18 名，下葉兩半各 9 欄共 36 名，兩葉合共 70 個村名，可辨認者盡是今元朗、屏山、屯門（錦田村、屏山村、廈川村、長岡村、錫降圍、錫降村、東頭村、屯門村、輞川村、水邊圍、水邊村、馬田村、欖口村、木橋頭、大橋村、橫洲村、大井村、石步李屋村、石步林屋村）同大嶼山（沙螺灣、石壁村、梅窩村、牛凹村）一帶；標目右手邊嘅兩個村名（新圍、深水田）屬上一段，唔會當官富司村名；標目亦印證咗批次 M4／M5 由客籍段反推嘅結論（掃描本第 61、62 頁兩葉確屬官富司本籍段）。批次 M8 續讀官富司本籍段三葉（掃描本第 60 頁上下兩葉同第 61 頁下葉），合共 110 個村名：第 60 頁上葉右半 20 名（塘福村、石頭莆、石甲門、二澳村、平洲灣、青龍頭、水口村、由古蓢、龍躍頭、河上鄉、金錢村、燕岡村、丙岡圍、孔嶺村、上水村、莆上村、嶺下村、隔田村、永安村、橋邊莆）、左半 18 名（粉壁嶺、松柏蓢、古洞村、大嶺下、石湖墟、洲頭村、新田村、張屋村、唐公嶺、長瀝村、官涌村、米歩村、軍地村、黎峒村、丹竹坑、泰亨村、大歩頭、交屋村），可辨認者係今大嶼山、荃灣（塘福村、二澳村、水口村、青龍頭）同北區（龍躍頭、河上鄉、金錢村、燕岡村〔今燕崗〕、丙岡圍〔今丙崗〕、孔嶺村、上水村、莆上村、粉壁嶺〔今粉嶺〕、松柏蓢〔今松柏塱〕、古洞村、石湖墟、新田村、米歩村〔今米埔〕、軍地村、黎峒村〔今萊洞〕、丹竹坑、泰亨村、大歩頭〔今大埔頭〕）；第 60 頁下葉兩半各 18 名（大歩墟〔即大埔墟〕、大陳屋、大黃屋、南坑村、塘坑村、塘面村、鍾屋村、烏溪沙、西澳村、井頭、大洞村…官坑村、西逕村〔今西徑〕、榕樹澳、沙角尾、北港村、蠔涌村、大浪村、北潭村、赤逕村〔今赤徑〕…），可辨認者係大埔、沙田／馬鞍山同西貢；第 61 頁下葉兩半各 18 名（福興圍、田貝村、赤尾村、隔塘村、泥岡村、羅坊村、筆架山、鳳凰湖…），可辨認者同今深圳羅湖、福田一帶舊村名相同。即官富司本籍段逐葉累計 68（第 59 頁）＋74（第 60 頁）＋36（第 61 下）＝178 名，全段同志錄 298 條嘅逐葉對比已由批次 M10 補齊（餘下第 61 上、第 62 上下四頁逐葉各 36 名），全段逐葉 300 名對志錄 298 條差 2、同司客籍 −2 相抵、合計 492 ✓（第 58 頁上下已由批次 M9 核讀：實測屬縣丞段，唔係官富司本籍段）。批次 M9 連讀掃描本第 57、58 頁上下四葉（合共 139 個村名），定位【典史管屬客籍村莊 附】（第 57 頁上葉左半）、【縣丞管屬村莊】（第 57 頁下葉右半）、【縣丞管屬客籍村莊 附】（第 58 頁上葉左半）三個分段標目：典史客籍 4＋2＝6 名同志錄所記 6 條完全吻合，縣丞客籍 6＋36＋2＝44 名同志錄所記 44 條完全吻合（其中 2 名即第 59 頁上葉標目右手邊嘅新圍、深水田），縣丞本籍逐葉 34＋28＝62 名對志錄 60 條差 2（記缺口，唔硬改）；四司段落次序由此確立——典史→縣丞→官富司→福永司，四司合計 67＋6＋60＋44＋298＋194＋185＝854，同志錄所記全縣 854 條村莊一致。該四葉讀到嘅村名盡係今深圳南頭（流塘村、後海村、龜廟村、伶仃村）、大鵬（大鵬城內、大鵬城外、水頭村、鹽田村、王母墟）、葵涌同南澳（葵涌村、葵涌墟、土洋、南澳村、水頭沙、鹿嘴村）一帶，一條都唔屬香港；官富司本籍段嘅範圍亦由此收窄為第 59 頁上葉至第 63 頁上葉標目右邊 14 名（批次 M10 已逐葉點算）。批次 M11 再由典史本籍段之前補讀卷之二「城市」分段（墟市同街市名單，掃描本第 55 頁上下兩葉同第 56 頁上葉 26 個名，另以 1800 px 半葉圖高倍重核第 56 頁下葉）：全段逐條 41 個名（第 55 上葉左半標目「城市」後 8 個＋第 55 下葉 18 個＋第 56 上葉 15 個），《香港志》志錄所記 1819 年香港四個墟市（圓朗墟、石湖墟、大步墟、長洲墟；EV-18190000-21／22）全部在內，而掃描本小字註同志錄逐點互證（圓朗墟「即舊志大橋墩墟」、石湖墟「舊志天岡 今移石湖」、大步墟即志錄「大步頭墟」）；志錄所記康熙志 1688 年三個香港墟市（大橋墩墟、天岡墟、大步頭墟；EV-16880000-01）同 1669 年三族合建天岡墟、後來遷往石湖墟（EV-16690000-18）喺嘉慶志以新舊名再現。批次 M11 同時更正批次 M10 五處字形（萬岡村→莆圍村、整頭村→墪頭村、塘蔭村→塘蓢村、大坳墟→大步墟，另莘塘村同西歷村確認照錄）。另批次 M12 讀卷之二「氣候」門（氣候總述、「風異 附」、引《廣東通志》〈廣東月令〉逐月物候同「占候 附」）同「風俗」門（全門十二項，至跋語「可謹記之以備觀覽焉」止；其中「過禮」一條同志錄 EV-undated-697 逐字互證）；另批次 M13 讀卷之二「疆域」門界至段（掃描本第 51 頁上葉，版心逐字實測「新安縣志 卷之二 疆域」、頁次「三」：北至羊凹山八十里與東莞縣缺口司分界、東北至西鄉凹山一百五十里與歸善縣碧甲司分界、西南至三牙牌山一百二十里與香山縣澳門廳分界、西北至合瀾海面八十里與東莞縣缺口司分界、東南至沱灣山二百四十里與歸善縣碧甲司分界，連舊志糾正小字註同按語，一律高倍逐字核到；未能在高倍確認嘅字形一律留缺口，唔當已核字）；「疆域」界至同志錄未有對應條目（最接近嘅係海防巡邏同佛堂門事件），本站唔會配對。批次 M13 續讀「疆域」按語尾段同全門收尾（掃描本第 51 頁上葉最後兩欄，以及該葉之下葉右半；下葉版心已題「新安縣志 卷之二 分野」、頁次「四」）：按語末句「……固不能不合計海面，而遺居民於幅幬之外也」（「幬」「幅」兩字 2026-10-21 補核一輪全部高倍確認；「故須」之前半句「以四至定縣治不能以縣治定四至」同欄 16 字亦已補核到），續以「故須統計海洋，開方畫界」、斥舊志「但即縣治陸地而論四至八到，皆不足憑」、問「佛堂門外如蒲臺、長洲、大嶼山、擔杆山各處居民，竟不得隸於新安版圖乎」、指府志「南抵海四十里」之誤、記「今就現在形勢合計海陸，酌定里數，而海面則以極盡處之山為止」、記縣境「東長西縮，東南寬而西北狹，縣城實偏於西北」同舊志縣境圖「將縣城繪列中宮，亦失方位」，末句「邑由城至府二百四十里，上至京八千餘里」；同批次並讀「分野」門全文（起段掃描本第 51 頁下葉左半、尾段第 52 頁上葉右半）：邑地隸廣州、其次星紀、其星牽牛、其辰為丑，引皇甫謐帝王世紀、唐天文志、春秋元命苞、晉隋元志、蔡邕月令章句、明史天文志，斷廣州為牛女分，並以表景揆度計一度二千九百三十餘里、縣去郡二百四十里（同上一葉末句互證）；志錄 36,501 條冇「分野」字樣，故「分野」唔作配對；初輪未能在高倍確認嘅三處（「晉天文志」之後一詞、蔡邕一條同表景一句嘅「三」字、按語「幅」字）已於 2026-10-21 補核一輪全部高倍逐字核到——「晉天文志」之後為「觀世紀」三字、兩個「三」字字形完好（維持原刻「三」）、「幅幬」兩字齊全；一律冇改字、冇另立數字。核讀方法：逐頁高倍掃描比對；其餘各卷各頁未逐條核讀。ctext.org（中國哲學書電子化計劃，明文禁止擷取）同 hkmemory.hk（香港記憶，未見開放授權聲明）一律排除，唔會用嚟做來源。
  The public-domain gazetteer register holds 5 entries (the Yue Daji and the various Xin’an County Gazetteer editions) recording bibliographic data and the Commons licence, with rights re-verified through the Commons API each time and the sha1 kept. The scans carry no usable text layer (extraction yields glyph codes with no ToUnicode mapping), and automated OCR (macOS Vision, tested across 176 pages) is too error-prone to publish; so far 41 content facts have been read by hand, cross-checked against the archive and published (the Guanfu Mountain entry in the Kangxi gazetteer, set against the archive’s 1277 Guanfu Chang entries; from the Jiaqing gazetteer its indigenous and Hakka village lists (one stretch of the indigenous list names the villages of Hong Kong Island, Kowloon and Sha Tin, Hong Kong Cun, Wong Nai Chung, Pok Fu Lam, So Kwun Po, Nga Tsin Wai, Tsim Sha Tsui and Sham Shui Po among them, and, in the Hakka list, the whole six-leaf section headed “Hakka villages under the Guanfu Office, appended” on pages 63 to 65 of the scan, its 192 village names coming within two of the 194 Hakka villages the archive records for that office — 烏蛟田, 荔枝窩, 鎖腦盤, 谷埠, 榕樹凹, 鹽竈下, 南涌圍, 七木橋, 鹿頸, 担水坑, 蓮麻坑, 麻雀嶺 and 萬屋邊 at Sha Tau Kok, 碗窰, 社山, 沙螺洞, 樟樹灘, 梧桐寨 and 大菴 in Tai Po, 城門, 穿龍, 淺灣, 葵涌子, 青衣, 油甘頭, 花山 and 響石 in Tsuen Wan, Kwai Chung and Tsing Yi, and 白沙澳, 井欄樹, 沙角尾, 上洋, 檳榔灣 and 孟公屋 in Sai Kung, with 九肚 in Sha Tin), and, from the same juan, the whole of the “Villages under the Fuyong Office” and “Hakka villages under the Fuyong Office, appended” sections (lower leaf of page 65 to the lower leaf of page 68 of the scan): 154 indigenous and 31 Hakka villages, tallying exactly with the 154 and 31 the archive records for that office, the section closing with the gazetteer’s own note that the county then held over 570 indigenous and over 270 Hakka villages under the county deputy, the registrar and two police offices, and every identifiable name in it lying in Shenzhen today (Shajing, Yabian, Gushu, Huaide, Huangtian, Xinqiao, Shangliao and Changzhen in Bao’an; Loucun, Tianwei, Xitian and Shutian in Guangming; Guantian and Luzu in Shiyan; Hongtian in Longhua; Baimang in Nanshan), so that no village in it can be shown to be in Hong Kong today — Tuen Mun, Lung Kwu Tan and So Kwun Wat must be sought in the indigenous Guanfu list or in the county deputy’s and registrar’s stretches; the coastal-defence juan and the preface note on the compilation, set against the archive’s 1819 entries on the villages of the Guanfu Office; the same gazetteer’s juan 12, whose “coastal-defence topography” section names the Nantou fort’s six stations — Fat Tong Mun, Lung Shuen Wan, Lok Kak, Tai O, Longtao Wan and Long Pak — the Lantau, Nantou and Chiwan batteries, Kang Shoubai’s defence of the Tai Pang garrison city in Longqing 5, Chen Yao’s capture of Tai Pang city in Shunzhi 4 and Yin Jin’s eight matters of coastal defence, and whose “fleet” section gives the Nantou fort’s warships from fifty-three down to forty-eight together with the rice-boats and dredge-net boats of the Xin’an and Tai Pang camps, set against the archive’s 1563 entry on the six naval fortresses (four of them within present-day Hong Kong, each with over two hundred troops), its 1540 three-route sea patrol, its 1630 and 1633–1635 entries on Li Kuiji and Liu Xiang, its 1682 entries on Tuen Mun camp and its four stations, its 1729 Kei Yik Kok battery, and its 1646, 1647 and 1656 entries on Chen Yao, Li Wanrong and Huang Yingjie’s siege on Tai Pang mountain; and the same gazetteer’s juan 13, whose three sections record the 1662 evacuation and 1669 restoration of the boundary, the 1807 hail at Kowloon and Ho Chung that killed cattle together with the year-by-year disasters under Qianlong and Jiaqing and with the Ming (Jiajing to Chongzhen) and early-Qing (Shunzhi to Kangxi) stretches of the same section, whose earthquakes, comets, droughts, rice prices, epidemics and typhoon floods include the Kangxi 1 tide that moved the villages and the Kangxi 8 tide that restored them, a note closing that stretch marking where the old Kangxi edition ends as a source, and the 1516 occupation of the Tun Mun sea by the Folangji — set respectively against the archive’s entries for the evacuation and restoration, the 1807 hail and the Battle of Tun Mun). the two leaves of page 59 of the scan, which carry the heading “Villages under the Guanfu Office” and open that office’s indigenous list, have likewise been read leaf by leaf: the heading itself stands in the second column from the right in the upper leaf, followed by fourteen names in the right half and eighteen in the left, with thirty-six more on the lower leaf, seventy names in all, every identifiable one lying around Yuen Long, Ping Shan and Tuen Mun (錦田村, 屏山村, 廈川村, 長岡村, 錫降圍, 錫降村, 東頭村, 屯門村, 輞川村, 水邊圍, 水邊村, 馬田村, 欖口村, 木橋頭, 大橋村, 橫洲村, 大井村, 石步李屋村 and 石步林屋村) and on Lantau (沙螺灣, 石壁村, 梅窩村 and 牛凹村); the two names to the right of the heading (新圍 and 深水田) belong to the preceding stretch and are not counted as Guanfu villages, and the heading also confirms what batches M4 and M5 inferred back from the Hakka section — the leaves on pages 61 and 62 of the scan do belong to the indigenous Guanfu list. Batch M8 read three further leaves of the indigenous Guanfu list (both leaves of page 60 and the lower leaf of page 61 of the scan), 110 names in all: twenty in the right half of the upper leaf of page 60 (塘福村, 石頭莆, 石甲門, 二澳村, 平洲灣, 青龍頭, 水口村, 由古蓢, 龍躍頭, 河上鄉, 金錢村, 燕岡村, 丙岡圍, 孔嶺村, 上水村, 莆上村, 嶺下村, 隔田村, 永安村 and 橋邊莆) and eighteen in its left half (粉壁嶺, 松柏蓢, 古洞村, 大嶺下, 石湖墟, 洲頭村, 新田村, 張屋村, 唐公嶺, 長瀝村, 官涌村, 米歩村, 軍地村, 黎峒村, 丹竹坑, 泰亨村, 大歩頭 and 交屋村), the identifiable ones lying on Lantau or in what is now Tsuen Wan (塘福村, 二澳村, 水口村 and 青龍頭) and in the North District (龍躍頭, 河上鄉, 金錢村, 燕岡村 — now 燕崗 — 丙岡圍 — now 丙崗 — 孔嶺村, 上水村, 莆上村, 粉壁嶺 — now 粉嶺 — 松柏蓢 — now 松柏塱 — 古洞村, 石湖墟, 新田村, 米歩村 — now 米埔 — 軍地村, 黎峒村 — now 萊洞 — 丹竹坑, 泰亨村 and 大歩頭 — now 大埔頭); eighteen names to each half of the lower leaf of page 60 (大歩墟 — Tai Po Market — 大陳屋, 大黃屋, 南坑村, 塘坑村, 塘面村, 鍾屋村, 烏溪沙, 西澳村, 井頭, 大洞村 … 官坑村, 西逕村 — now 西徑 — 榕樹澳, 沙角尾, 北港村, 蠔涌村, 大浪村, 北潭村, 赤逕村 — now 赤徑 …), identifiable ones in Tai Po, Sha Tin and Ma On Shan, and Sai Kung; and eighteen names to each half of the lower leaf of page 61 (福興圍, 田貝村, 赤尾村, 隔塘村, 泥岡村, 羅坊村, 筆架山, 鳳凰湖 …), identifiable ones matching old villages in what is now Shenzhen’s Luohu and Futian districts. The indigenous Guanfu list therefore stands at 68 (page 59) + 74 (page 60) + 36 (lower leaf of page 61) = 178 names counted leaf by leaf, the tally against the archive’s 298 villages, which batch M10 has since completed — the four remaining pages, thirty-six names each, bring the whole stretch to 300, the two-name excess cancelling the office’s two-name Hakka shortfall (batch M9 showed that pages 57 and 58 belong to the county deputy’s and the registrar’s sections, not to the indigenous Guanfu list). Batch M9 read four leaves (both leaves of pages 57 and 58 of the scan; 139 names in all) and located three sub-headings — “Hakka villages under the Registrar’s Office, appended” (left half of the upper leaf of page 57), “Villages under the County Deputy” (right half of the lower leaf of page 57) and “Hakka villages under the County Deputy, appended” (left half of the upper leaf of page 58). The registrar’s Hakka list came to 4 + 2 = 6 names, matching the archive’s six exactly; the county deputy’s Hakka list to 6 + 36 + 2 = 44 names, matching the archive’s forty-four exactly (two of them, 新圍 and 深水田, standing to the right of the Guanfu heading on the upper leaf of page 59); and his indigenous list to 34 + 28 = 62 names against the archive’s sixty — two more, recorded as a gap rather than used to correct the archive’s figure. The order of the four offices’ lists is thereby fixed — registrar, county deputy, Guanfu, Fuyong — and their totals, 67 + 6 + 60 + 44 + 298 + 194 + 185, come to 854, the county-wide figure the archive records. Every name on those four leaves lies in what is now Shenzhen — Nantou (流塘村, 後海村, 龜廟村, 伶仃村), Dapeng (大鵬城內, 大鵬城外, 水頭村, 鹽田村, 王母墟), Kuichong and Nan’ao (葵涌村, 葵涌墟, 土洋, 南澳村, 水頭沙, 鹿嘴村) — none in Hong Kong; the extent of the indigenous Guanfu list is narrowed accordingly to the upper leaf of page 59 through the fourteen names to the right of the heading on the upper leaf of page 63. Batch M11 then read the “Cities and Markets” subsection of juan 2, standing before the registrar’s indigenous stretch (the markets and street-markets list: twenty-six names on both leaves of page 55 and the upper leaf of page 56 of the scan, plus a high-magnification re-read of the lower leaf of page 56 on 1800 px half-leaf crops), counting forty-one names entry by entry (eight after the section title at the head of the left half of the upper leaf of page 55, eighteen on the lower leaf of page 55 and fifteen on the upper leaf of page 56). All four Hong Kong markets the Chronicles archive records for 1819 (圓朗墟, 石湖墟, 大步墟 and 長洲墟; EV-18190000-21／22) stand in it, and the scan’s small-type notes corroborate the archive point by point (圓朗墟 “that is, the old gazetteer’s 大橋墩墟”, 石湖墟 “the old gazetteer has it at 天岡, now moved to 石湖”, and 大步墟 as the archive’s 大步頭墟); the archive’s three Hong Kong markets from the Kangxi gazetteer of 1688 (大橋墩墟, 天岡墟 and 大步頭墟; EV-16880000-01) and its record of 天岡墟 being built from 1669 and later moved to 石湖墟 (EV-16690000-18) reappear in the Jiaqing list under new or old names. Batch M11 also corrected five characters of batch M10 (萬岡村 → 莆圍村, 整頭村 → 墪頭村, 塘蔭村 → 塘蓢村, 大坳墟 → 大步墟, with 莘塘村 and 西歷村 confirmed as read). Method: page-by-page high-magnification scan; batch M12 went on to read the “Climate” section of juan 2 (its general account, the “weather anomalies” appendix, the month-by-month seasonal observations quoted from the Guangdong provincial gazetteer’s “Monthly Ordinances”, and the divination appendix) together with the “Customs” section in full down to its closing note, whose “passing the rites” clause is witnessed word for word by archive entry EV-undated-697; batch M13 read the boundary section of the “Territory” section in juan 2 (upper leaf of page 51 of the scan, its running head reading “Xin’an County Gazetteer, juan 2, Territory”, leaf three) — eighty li north to Yang’ao Shan bordering the Quekou subprefecture of Dongguan county, one hundred and fifty li north-east to Xiang’ao Shan bordering the Bijia subprefecture of Guishan county, one hundred and twenty li south-west to Sanyapai Shan bordering the Macao subprefecture of Xiangshan county, eighty li north-west to the sea off Helan bordering the Quekou subprefecture of Dongguan county, and two hundred and forty li south-east to Tuowan Shan bordering the Bijia subprefecture of Guishan county — with the small-type corrections of the earlier gazetteer and the editorial note, all read character by character at high magnification, and any form that could not be confirmed at high magnification left as a gap rather than treated as read. The archive holds no entry matching the gazetteer’s “Territory” boundaries (the nearest material being coastal patrols and Fat Tong Mun entries), and no pairing is made. Batch M13 then read the tail of the “Territory” editorial note and the section’s closing entry (the last two columns of the upper leaf of page 51 of the scan and the right half of that leaf’s partner, the lower leaf, whose running head already reads “Xin’an County Gazetteer, juan 2, Field allocations”, folio four): the note’s closing sentence “… the sea must be counted in, and the inhabitants not left outside the county’s bounds” (幬 and 幅 both confirmed at high magnification in a further pass on 2026-10-21, together with the sixteen-character clause “以四至定縣治不能以縣治定四至” that runs into 故須), then “hence the sea and the ocean must be counted in, the grid laid out and the boundary drawn”, the rejection of the old gazetteer’s land-only reasoning, the question whether the inhabitants of Po Toi, Cheung Chau, Lantau and Tam Kan beyond Fat Tong Mun are really to be shut out of the county, the error in the provincial gazetteer’s forty li south to the sea, the fixing of distances by counting land and sea together with the furthest island as the sea’s limit, the county’s long east-to-west and narrow north-west shape with the county town lying to the north-west and the old map’s central placement of it out of position, and the closing “from the county town to the prefectural city is two hundred and forty li, and to the capital more than eight thousand li”; in the same batch the “Field allocations” section was read in full (opening on the left half of the lower leaf of page 51, closing on the right half of the upper leaf of page 52): the county under Guangzhou, its allotment Xingji, its star Qianniu, its branch chou, citing Huangfu Mi’s Jiwang shiji, the Tang astronomical treatise, the Chunqiu yuanmingbao, the Jin and Sui treatises, Cai Yong’s Monthly Ordinances and the Ming astronomical treatise, and assigning Guangzhou to the Ox and Girl, one degree reckoned at more than two thousand nine hundred and thirty li by gnomon shadow and the county lying two hundred and forty li from the prefecture (agreeing with the closing sentence of the preceding leaf); the archive’s 36,501 entries contain no “field allocations”, so no pairing is made for it; the three points that could not be confirmed at high magnification in the first pass (the term after “the Jin astronomical treatise”, the 三 of Cai Yong’s figure and of the gnomon-shadow figure, and the 幅 of 幅幬) were each re-read character by character at high magnification on 2026-10-21 — the missing term proving to be 觀世紀, both 三 characters standing as printed with no wear, and 幅幬 complete — with no emendation and no restated figure. the remaining volumes and pages have not been read entry by entry. ctext.org (scraping expressly prohibited) and hkmemory.hk (no open licence found) are excluded and are never used as sources.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-13公共領域古籍掃描本另有一批村名已局部核讀、但字形未能在高倍放大下確認，所以一律唔上線：嘉慶《新安縣志》卷之二「都里」本籍段、掃描本第 61 頁上葉兩頁，疑「薄寮村」「赤磡村」（批次 M10 覆核時字形近「赤礪村」）「薄鳧林」（批次 M10 字形近「薄崑林」）「掃管莆」，以及右半嘅「牛眠村」「逕口村」「古瑾村」「二黃店村」——位置喺香港村、黃泥涌、薄鳧林同掃管莆一帶——只列作待覆核，未完成覆核前唔會出現喺時間軸；同兩頁另外 28 個村名已照掃描本字形入庫（批次 M10 逐葉點算共 36 名）。
  A set of village names in the public-domain scans has been read in part but kept out of publication because their glyphs could not be confirmed at high magnification: in the indigenous stretch of juan 2, “Villages”, in the Jiaqing Xin’an County Gazetteer (both pages of the upper leaf of page 61 of the scan), the names apparently reading 薄寮村, 赤磡村 (batch M10 read the character as 礪), 薄鳧林 (batch M10 read the middle character as 崑) and 掃管莆, together with 牛眠村, 逕口村, 古瑾村 and 二黃店村 in the right half, standing beside 香港村, 黃泥涌, 薄鳧林 and 掃管莆, are held back pending re-check and appear on no timeline until then, while the other twenty-eight names on those two pages are published as the scan prints them (batch M10 counted thirty-six names leaf by leaf).
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-14嘉慶《新安縣志》卷二「都里」「官富司管屬客籍村莊 附」段（掃描本第 63 至 65 頁六葉）另有兩類未及覆核，一律唔會當香港村落引用：第一，一批村名字形未能在高倍放大下確認——大輞仔（同葉版心兩側各見一次，疑其中一個係西貢「大網仔」）、莆隔、草莆仔、樟樹莆、平洋、平洋村、風坑、馬尿、烏鑪涌、茅田子、逕下、大林園、朝陽圍、新村、大蟓（疑「大蠔」）、橫萌、東鎮皮圍、賴屋山、杯凹、甲蠔洲、蔭口、蕨嶺、大芒輦、寨凹、水蕉、長莆、棉管蓢、大欖、橫台山、馬鞍岡、上下窰、栢鰲石、田富子、帳頂角、上下塘、花香爐、下坑、洞子、坪山子、小莆、園下、莆心排、蓮逕、沙岡墟、黃寓合、珩溪浦、平萌、黃沙坑、塘逕、大埔圍、鐵場、莆草洞、羊頭圍、畫眉凹、緣分、翟屋邊、芋荷塘、松園下、福田村、西湖、岡頭子、芋台灣、荔枝屋、淬田子、岡陶下、大岃子、稈藪萌、奚頭、羊頭嶺；第二，六葉大部分村名屬今深圳、東莞境（同名村落兩地皆有），本站唔逐條比定，亦唔會逐村指派司屬。同段前後嘅分段標目已由批次 M9 定位：典史客籍標目喺掃描本第 57 頁上葉左半、縣丞本籍標目（「縣丞管屬村莊」）喺第 57 頁下葉右半、縣丞客籍標目喺第 58 頁上葉左半——連同第 59 頁上葉嘅官富司標目，四司各段起點齊備（見下面另一條）。「福永司管屬村莊」同「福永司管屬客籍村莊 附」兩段（第 65 頁下葉至第 68 頁下葉）已於同一批核讀入庫，見下面另一條。
  Two kinds of item in the “Hakka villages under the Guanfu Office, appended” section of juan 2, “Villages”, in the Jiaqing Xin’an County Gazetteer (the six leaves of pages 63 to 65 of the scan) remain unchecked and are never cited as Hong Kong villages: first, a set of names whose glyphs could not be confirmed at high magnification — 大輞仔 (appearing once on each side of the running head of the same leaf, one of them perhaps the Sai Kung 大網仔), 莆隔, 草莆仔, 樟樹莆, 平洋, 平洋村, 風坑, 馬尿, 烏鑪涌, 茅田子, 逕下, 大林園, 朝陽圍, 新村, 大蟓 (perhaps 大蠔), 橫萌, 東鎮皮圍, 賴屋山, 杯凹, 甲蠔洲, 蔭口, 蕨嶺, 大芒輦, 寨凹, 水蕉, 長莆, 棉管蓢, 大欖, 橫台山, 馬鞍岡, 上下窰, 栢鰲石, 田富子, 帳頂角, 上下塘, 花香爐, 下坑, 洞子, 坪山子, 小莆, 園下, 莆心排, 蓮逕, 沙岡墟, 黃寓合, 珩溪浦, 平萌, 黃沙坑, 塘逕, 大埔圍, 鐵場, 莆草洞, 羊頭圍, 畫眉凹, 緣分, 翟屋邊, 芋荷塘, 松園下, 福田村, 西湖, 岡頭子, 芋台灣, 荔枝屋, 淬田子, 岡陶下, 大岃子, 稈藪萌, 奚頭 and 羊頭嶺; and second, the many names standing in what is Shenzhen or Dongguan today (with like-named villages on both sides of the border), which are not pinned to a place and no village of which is assigned to any office. Around that section the sub-headings were located in batch M9: the heading “Hakka villages under the Registrar’s Office, appended” stands in the left half of the upper leaf of page 57 of the scan, “Villages under the County Deputy” in the right half of the lower leaf of page 57, and “Hakka villages under the County Deputy, appended” in the left half of the upper leaf of page 58 — which, with the Guanfu heading on the upper leaf of page 59, gives the starting point of every office’s list (see the following entry). The “Villages under the Fuyong Office” and “Hakka villages under the Fuyong Office, appended” sections (lower leaf of page 65 to lower leaf of page 68) were read and published in the same batch — see the following entry.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-15嘉慶《新安縣志》卷二「都里」「福永司管屬村莊」同「福永司管屬客籍村莊 附」兩段（掃描本第 65 頁下葉至第 68 頁下葉，合共 185 個村名）另有一批村名未及覆核，一律唔會當作已核實村名引用：字形未能在高倍放大下確認嘅——沙莆村、豪涌村（疑「蠔涌」）、蔭下村、大囧村、烏木〔末字未能確認〕、公爵藪、白沙苒、苫田村、壆頭岡、鄧家萌、李松萌、山尾新村（「山」字特小、緊貼「尾新村」之上）。同段可辨認嘅村名絕大部分屬今深圳寶安、光明、石岩、龍華、南山（同名村落兩地皆有），本站唔逐條比定、亦唔逐村指派司屬；客籍段嘅「青山下」（疑屯門青山腳下）同「白芒村」（疑大嶼山白芒）亦可能係深圳同名村落，屬「歧義即棄」，未經覆核前唔會計入任何香港村落數字。今日香港新界西（屯門、龍鼓灘、掃管笏、大欖涌）嘅村名並唔喺福永司段，要喺官富司本籍段（掃描本第 59 頁上葉至第 62 頁上下葉；批次 M9 已證第 57、58 頁屬縣丞同典史兩段）或縣丞、典史兩段搵。
  A set of names in the “Villages under the Fuyong Office” and “Hakka villages under the Fuyong Office, appended” sections of juan 2, “Villages”, in the Jiaqing Xin’an County Gazetteer (lower leaf of page 65 to lower leaf of page 68 of the scan; 185 names in all) remain unchecked and are never cited as confirmed village names: those whose glyphs could not be confirmed at high magnification are 沙莆村, 豪涌村 (perhaps 蠔涌), 蔭下村, 大囧村, 烏木〔last character unconfirmed〕, 公爵藪, 白沙苒, 苫田村, 壆頭岡, 鄧家萌, 李松萌 and 山尾新村 (where 山 is printed very small, tight above 尾新村). Nearly all the identifiable names lie in Shenzhen’s Bao’an, Guangming, Shiyan, Longhua and Nanshan districts today (with like-named villages on both sides of the border), and this site neither pins them to a place nor assigns any village to an office; two names in the Hakka list, 青山下 (perhaps the foot of Castle Peak at Tuen Mun) and 白芒村 (perhaps Pak Mong on Lantau), may equally be same-named Shenzhen villages and are dropped as ambiguous, counted in no Hong Kong total until they are re-checked. The villages of western Hong Kong today — Tuen Mun, Lung Kwu Tan, So Kwun Wat and Tai Lam Chung — are not in the Fuyong Office’s list and must be sought in the indigenous Guanfu list (upper leaf of page 59 to the fourteen names to the right of the heading on the upper leaf of page 63 of the scan, all counted leaf by leaf in batch M10; batch M9 has shown that pages 57 and 58 belong to the county deputy’s and the registrar’s stretches) or in the county deputy’s and registrar’s stretches.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-16嘉慶《新安縣志》卷二「都里」【官富司管屬村莊】標目所在兩葉（掃描本第 59 頁上下兩葉，合共 70 個村名）另有一批字形未能在高倍放大下確認，一律唔會當作已核實村名引用：上葉左半嘅「墪頭圍」（首字形近「墪」／「墩」）、欄首帶小字「竹」嘅一格（該欄只讀到小字「竹」，其下兩字疑「園圍」，未能確認）、下葉嘅蚶蛇鬱（末字未確認）、鱟田村（首字未確認）、鴉柏嶺（首字疑「鴉」／「鵪」）、梅窩村（首字疑「梅」／「海」）、莆塘下（首字疑「莆」／「蒲」）同中心巷。同一批亦要注意：上葉有幾欄村名嘅欄首以小字標出圖名（讀作〔屏山〕〔元萌〕），呢類小字係圖名抑或村名前綴未完全確認，本站一律照錄、唔會推定其義；標目右手邊嘅「新圍」「深水田」屬標目之前嘅上一段（疑即縣丞段尾），唔計入官富司。可辨認嘅村名集中喺今元朗、屏山、屯門同大嶼山一帶（同名村落兩地皆有），本站唔逐條比定今址、唔逐村指派司屬、唔當統計數字。「官富司管屬村莊」整段由第 59 頁續見第 60 至 62 頁，逐葉點算同志錄所記官富司本籍 298 條嘅對比，留待餘下各葉讀完。
  A set of names on the two leaves carrying the “Villages under the Guanfu Office” heading in juan 2, “Villages”, of the Jiaqing Xin’an County Gazetteer (both leaves of page 59 of the scan, seventy names in all) remain unchecked and are never cited as confirmed village names: on the upper leaf’s left half 墪頭圍 (its first character shaped like 墪 or 墩), the column headed by a small 竹 (only the small character was read; the two characters below it appear to read 園圍 but could not be confirmed), and on the lower leaf 蚶蛇鬱 (last character unconfirmed), 鱟田村 (first character unconfirmed), 鴉柏嶺 (perhaps 鴉 or 鵪), 梅窩村 (perhaps 梅 or 海), 莆塘下 (perhaps 莆 or 蒲) and 中心巷. The same batch also calls for care over the small-type map names at the head of several columns on the upper leaf (read as 屏山 and 元萌): whether such characters name a map or prefix the village name is not fully confirmed, so they are transcribed as printed and never interpreted; and the 新圍 and 深水田 standing to the right of the heading belong to the stretch before it (probably the end of the county deputy’s list) and are not counted as Guanfu villages. The identifiable names lie around Yuen Long, Ping Shan and Tuen Mun and on Lantau (with like-named villages on both sides of the border); this site neither pins them to a modern site, nor assigns any village to an office, nor counts them as statistics. The “Villages under the Guanfu Office” section runs on from page 59 across pages 60 to 62 of the scan, so the leaf-by-leaf tally against the 298 indigenous villages the archive records for that office waits on the remaining leaves.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-17嘉慶《新安縣志》卷二「都里」官富司本籍段續三葉（掃描本第 60 頁上下兩葉同第 61 頁下葉，合共 110 個村名）另有一批字形未能在高倍放大下確認，一律唔會當作已核實村名引用：石甲門（疑即今日石門甲）、由古蓢（末字形近「蓢」／「萌」，未能確認）、漣涌村、圓頭村、窖塘村、樟上村、菱香逕、仰窩村、塋下墩（首字形近「塋」／「營」）、澗頭圍、山雞蔞、蔭貝村、土狗莆、清慶村、平源村、迴田村。同一批亦要注意：第 60 頁下葉「大黃屋」「大陳屋」兩個名之前各有一個小字「窩」，呢類小字係圖／約名前綴抑或村名嘅一部分未完全確認，本站一律照錄、唔會推定其義（同 M7 記作〔屏山〕〔元萌〕嘅欄首小字同類）。可辨認嘅村名分佈喺今大嶼山、荃灣、北區、大埔、沙田、西貢同深圳羅湖／福田（同名村落兩地皆有），本站唔逐條比定今址、唔逐村指派司屬、唔當統計數字。官富司本籍段逐葉累計 178 名（第 59 頁 68＋第 60 頁 74＋第 61 下 36；第 61 上同第 62 上下三葉已入庫但未逐葉點算），同志錄 298 條嘅對比留待餘下各葉讀完。另外，第 60 頁上葉「松柏蓢」嘅末字經超高倍局部圖確認係「蓢」（艹＋朗），同形字即 M7 記作〔元萌〕嘅欄首小字，疑為〔元蓢〕——M7 條目嘅未確認標記保留。
  A set of names on three further leaves of the indigenous Guanfu list in juan 2, “Villages”, of the Jiaqing Xin’an County Gazetteer (both leaves of page 60 and the lower leaf of page 61 of the scan, 110 names in all) remain unchecked and are never cited as confirmed village names: 石甲門 (probably today’s 石門甲), 由古蓢 (last character shaped like 蓢 or 萌, unconfirmed), 漣涌村, 圓頭村, 窖塘村, 樟上村, 菱香逕, 仰窩村, 塋下墩 (first character shaped like 塋 or 營), 澗頭圍, 山雞蔞, 蔭貝村, 土狗莆, 清慶村, 平源村 and 迴田村. Note too that 大黃屋 and 大陳屋 on the lower leaf of page 60 each stand behind a small-type 窩: whether such small characters name a map or covenant or form part of the village name is not fully confirmed, so they are transcribed as printed and never interpreted (the same kind of small-type prefix as the 屏山 and 元萌 read in batch M7). The identifiable names lie on Lantau and in what is now Tsuen Wan, the North District, Tai Po, Sha Tin, Sai Kung and Shenzhen’s Luohu and Futian districts (with like-named villages on both sides of the border); this site neither pins them to a modern site, nor assigns any village to an office, nor counts them as statistics. The indigenous Guanfu list now stands at 178 names counted leaf by leaf (68 on page 59, 74 on page 60 and 36 on the lower leaf of page 61; the upper leaf of page 61 and both leaves of page 62 entered the archive earlier and were counted in batch M10, thirty-six names to the page), bringing the whole stretch to 300 names against the archive’s 298, an excess that cancels the office’s two-name Hakka shortfall so that the office still totals 492. In the same run the last character of 松柏蓢 on the upper leaf of page 60 was confirmed at very high magnification to be 蓢 (艹 with 朗); the same character is the small-type map name at the head of a column that batch M7 read as 元萌, probably 元蓢, so M7’s unconfirmed marking stands.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-18嘉慶《新安縣志》卷二「都里」典史、縣丞兩段四葉（掃描本第 57、58 頁上下葉，合共 139 個村名）另有一批字形未能在高倍放大下確認，一律唔會當作已核實村名引用：鰲灣村（鰲／鼇）、東柵村、谿西村（谿／溪）、后滘村（首字「后」抑或「後」未確認）、周田莆、雛新村、莆心村、鰕來村（鰕／蝦）、蔗園村（蔗／蕉／簾）、并坑埔、半天雲、鳳岡里、碧洲圍、犬眠地上同犬眠地下、古樓嶺、埔錦村、吉龍里、王母墟、王母峒（峒／洞）、高圳頭、大確、犬眠地、登福、逕心、屯園子、黃欖坑、第三溪、洞背、鹽寮下、葵涌墟（墟／村）、柯屋圍、牛唇嶺、嶺下嶺、南坑埔、油草棚、高鐵村、楓木潦、鹿嘴村。同一批亦要注意：掃描本印「猪」（「豬」俗寫）同「脚」，正文一律寫正字；第 58 頁下葉「新屋仔」同葉兩見（一欄緊貼版心、另一欄配「鹽寮下」），照錄、唔推定係同一村抑或兩村；縣丞客籍段「王洞圍」「王洞墟」前各有一個小字「母」（縣丞段以外未見，作用未確認）；第 57 頁上葉〔黃里〕欄首小字同「下黃里」一名嘅關係亦未確認。四葉村名盡係今深圳南頭、大鵬、沙頭角、葵涌、南澳一帶（同名村落兩地皆有），本站唔逐條比定今址、唔逐村指派司屬、唔當統計數字。縣丞本籍段逐葉點算 62 名（第 57 頁下葉 34＋第 58 頁上葉 28），同《香港志》志錄所記縣丞本籍 60 條差 2，差異照站規留白、唔硬改志錄數字，待高倍覆核。批次 M10 已補齊：典史本籍段逐葉 67 名同志錄完全吻合、官富司本籍段逐葉 300 名對志錄 298 差 2（同司客籍 −2 相抵，合計 492 ✓）；兩段嘅字形缺口見下面另一條。
  A set of names on the four leaves of the registrar’s and county deputy’s stretches in juan 2, “Villages”, of the Jiaqing Xin’an County Gazetteer (both leaves of pages 57 and 58 of the scan; 139 names in all) remain unchecked and are never cited as confirmed village names: 鰲灣村 (鰲 or 鼇), 東柵村, 谿西村 (谿 or 溪), 后滘村 (first character 后 or 後, unconfirmed), 周田莆, 雛新村, 莆心村, 鰕來村 (鰕 or 蝦), 蔗園村 (蔗, 蕉 or 簾), 并坑埔, 半天雲, 鳳岡里, 碧洲圍, 犬眠地上 and 犬眠地下, 古樓嶺, 埔錦村, 吉龍里, 王母墟, 王母峒 (峒 or 洞), 高圳頭, 大確, 犬眠地, 登福, 逕心, 屯園子, 黃欖坑, 第三溪, 洞背, 鹽寮下, 葵涌墟 (墟 or 村), 柯屋圍, 牛唇嶺, 嶺下嶺, 南坑埔, 油草棚, 高鐵村, 楓木潦 and 鹿嘴村. Note too that the scan prints 猪 (a popular form of 豬) and 脚, for which this site writes the standard characters; that 新屋仔 appears twice on the lower leaf of page 58 (once in the column beside the running head, once paired with 鹽寮下), both transcribed as printed and neither assumed to be the same village; that 王洞圍 and 王洞墟 in the county deputy’s Hakka list each stand behind a small-type 母, unseen outside that stretch, whose force is unconfirmed; and that the relation between the 〔黃里〕 prefix on the upper leaf of page 57 and the separate name 下黃里 is likewise unconfirmed. Every name on those four leaves lies in what is now Shenzhen — Nantou, Dapeng, Shatoujiao, Kuichong, Nan’ao — with like-named villages on both sides of the border, so this site neither pins them to a modern site, nor assigns any village to an office, nor counts them as statistics. The county deputy’s indigenous stretch counts 62 names leaf by leaf (34 on the lower leaf of page 57 plus 28 on the upper leaf of page 58) against the sixty the Chronicles archive records, a difference left blank as the site’s rule requires rather than used to alter the archive’s figure, pending high-magnification re-checking. Batch M10 has completed both tallies: the registrar’s indigenous stretch counts 67 names leaf by leaf, matching the archive exactly, while the indigenous Guanfu list counts 300 leaf by leaf against the archive’s 298 (the office’s Hakka list being two short, so that its total of 492 still matches); the glyph gaps on those two stretches are listed in a separate item below.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-19嘉慶《新安縣志》卷二「都里」典史本籍段同官富司本籍段餘葉（批次 M10 讀：掃描本第 56 頁上下兩葉、第 61 頁上葉兩頁同第 62 頁上下四頁，合共八頁）另有一批字形未能在高倍放大下確認，一律唔會當作已核實村名引用：第 56 頁上葉左頁末欄欄首小字「南頭」之下兩個大字（上字「鎮」清楚，下字形近「沙」，兩字水平錯開，係一個村名抑或兩個單字村名未定；批次 M11 另以 1200 px 單欄圖再核，兩字確認係「鎮」「沙」但分段仍未定，維持缺口）；第 61 頁上葉「薄寮村」、「薄鳧林」（批次 M4 記作薄鳧林，本批字形近「薄崑林」）、「赤礪村」（批次 M4 記作赤磡村）、「掃管莆」、「牛眠村」、「逕口村」、「古瑾村」、「二黃店村」；第 62 頁「月岡屯」、「筲岡村」、「莆海村」。同段數字方面：官富司本籍段逐葉點算 300 名（第 59 頁 68＋第 60 頁 74＋第 61 頁 72＋第 62 頁 72＋第 63 頁上葉標目右邊 14），同《香港志》志錄所記本籍 298 條差 2；同司客籍段逐葉 192 名對志錄 194 條亦差 2（批次 M5 已記）——兩邊差額相抵，官富司合計 492 ✓ 同志錄 492，即差額屬「本籍／客籍」界線前後各 2 條嘅歸屬差，唔係漏讀；照站規唔硬改志錄數字，待高倍覆核。全縣逐段（照掃描本讀出）＝典史 73＋縣丞 106＋官富 492＋福永 185＝856，對志錄 854 差 2，全部落喺縣丞本籍（62 對 60）。典史本籍段逐葉 67 名（第 56 頁上葉左頁末欄 2＋第 56 頁下葉 36＋第 57 頁上葉 29）同志錄所記 67 條完全吻合；典史段村名盡係今深圳南山、寶安西鄉一帶（南山村、向南村、北頭村、大涌村、白石村、留仙洞、上川村、臣田村、鐵岡村、西鄉、隔岸村），冇一條屬香港。另：卷之二「城市」段（墟市／街市名單）已由批次 M11 整段核讀（掃描本第 55 頁上下兩葉，逐條 41 個名；同段第 55 頁下葉版心題「墟市」、第 56 頁上葉版心題「城市」，兩種寫法並存、照錄唔統一）；第 56 頁下葉五個字形缺口已由批次 M11 高倍重核定案（萬岡村→莆圍村、整頭村→墪頭村、塘蔭村→塘蓢村，另莘塘村、西歷村確認照錄），批次 M11 另列一批「城市」段待覆核字形（白灰洛、周家村墟、蛋家蓢墟、碧洲墟、烏石巖墟、塘頭下新墟、昇平墟、月岡屯墟）；第 56 頁下葉「西鄉」同「西鄉村」兩個名同頁各見一次，照錄、唔推定係同一村抑或兩村；第 62 頁下葉「松源頭村」首字「松」、左頁「塘下新墟」首字「塘」都以小字排（同批次 M8「山尾新村」一類），照錄。
  A set of names on eight pages read in batch M10 — both leaves of page 56, both pages of the upper leaf of page 61 and all four pages of page 62 of the scan, covering the registrar’s indigenous stretch and the rest of the indigenous Guanfu list — could not be confirmed at high magnification and are never cited as verified village names: on page 56 the two large characters under the small-type prefix 南頭 in the last column of the left half of the upper leaf (the upper one clearly 鎮, the lower shaped like 沙 and set off to the left; whether they form one name or two one-character names is undecided, and a further single-column re-read in batch M11 confirmed the two shapes as 鎮 and 沙 without settling the segmentation, so the item stays open); on the upper leaf of page 61, 薄寮村, 薄鳧林 (batch M4 read the middle character as 鳧, batch M10 as 崑), 赤礪村 (batch M4: 赤磡村), 掃管莆, 牛眠村, 逕口村, 古瑾村 and 二黃店村; and on page 62, 月岡屯, 筲岡村 and 莆海村. On the numbers: the indigenous Guanfu list counts 300 names leaf by leaf (68 on page 59, 74 on page 60, 72 on page 61, 72 on page 62 and the 14 names to the right of the heading on the upper leaf of page 63) against the archive’s 298, a difference of two, while the same office’s Hakka list counts 192 against the archive’s 194 (recorded in batch M5), a difference of two the other way; the two cancel, so the office totals 492 as the archive does, and the discrepancy lies purely in how two names either side of the indigenous–Hakka boundary are assigned rather than in anything missed — the archive’s figures are left uncorrected pending high-magnification re-checking. County-wide the scan gives 典史 73 + 縣丞 106 + 官富 492 + 福永 185 = 856 against the archive’s 854, the whole difference sitting on the county deputy’s indigenous list (62 against 60). The registrar’s indigenous stretch counts 67 names leaf by leaf (2 in the last column of the left half of the upper leaf of page 56, 36 on the lower leaf of page 56 and 29 on the upper leaf of page 57), exactly the archive’s figure, and every name on that stretch lies in present-day Shenzhen — Nanshan and the Xixiang district of Bao’an (南山村, 向南村, 北頭村, 大涌村, 白石村, 留仙洞, 上川村, 臣田村, 鐵岡村, 西鄉, 隔岸村) — with none in Hong Kong. Two further points: the “Cities and Markets” section of juan 2 (the markets and street-markets list) has since been read whole in batch M11 — both leaves of page 55, forty-one names entry by entry, its running head reading “墟市” on the lower leaf of page 55 and “Cities and Markets” on the upper leaf of page 56, two spellings coexisting within the one section and transcribed without harmonising — and the five character gaps listed for the lower leaf of page 56 were settled by that batch’s high-magnification re-read (萬岡村 as 莆圍村, 整頭村 as 墪頭村 and 塘蔭村 as 塘蓢村, with 莘塘村 and 西歷村 confirmed as read), while batch M11 lists a further set of characters to re-check in the “Cities and Markets” section (白灰洛, 周家村墟, 蛋家蓢墟, 碧洲墟, 烏石巖墟, 塘頭下新墟, 昇平墟, 月岡屯墟); and 西鄉 and 西鄉村 each occur once on the lower leaf of page 56, both transcribed with no inference as to whether they are one village or two, while the 松 of 松源頭村 and the 塘 of 塘下新墟 on the lower leaf of page 62 are set in small type (as with 山尾新村 in batch M8) and transcribed as printed.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-20工業同傳統行業：官方冇玩具業逐年產值、出口值或僱員序列——現存玩具數字只有「玩具、兒童產品同消費品」三類合計嘅監管數字（見 /industries），所以玩具單獨嘅逐年數字一律留白。至於「全球最大玩具出口地」，官方出處已經補齊：二〇〇四年投資推廣署新聞稿、二〇〇七年局長演講（出口總值超過九百五十七億港元、世界第二大，明文包括再次出口值）同二〇一七年司長演講（連轉口計全球第二大）三條都已立 fact，但三者年份同計算基礎唔同、唔可以互換，亦唔係逐年序列（見 /calibre#toy-exporter-ranking）；玩具街亦只有二〇一六年官方致辭嘅描述（即灣仔太原街），冇店舖數目。石礦場方面，官方最明確嘅記述只到二〇一八年「屯門藍地石礦場係本港唯一仍然運作」，之後未見更新嘅數目或牌照清單，產量亦冇序列；本地木材同柴炭產量官方並無此統計，一律唔會靠估補。呢幾項已逐頁核對過《香港年報2024》相關章節（第十三章商務和經濟發展只有玩具安全法例同抽查數字，第十五章規劃土地和發展只有地下採石研究同藍地先導選址）、政府一站通《香港便覽》系列、土木工程拓展署嘅年報及環保報告，以及政府跨網站搜尋（www.search.gov.hk，範圍限官方網站）；上述各處都冇玩具業逐年數字、現存石礦場數目同執照狀況、木材柴炭產量。紡織同製衣業嘅逐年出口值、工廠數目同僱員序列亦未整理。
  Industry and legacy trades: no official yearly output, export or employment series exists for toys — the surviving toy figures are regulatory totals combined for toys, children’s products and consumer goods (see /industries), so no toy-only yearly number is written. On the “world’s largest toy exporter” claim the official sources have now been found and registered: a 2004 InvestHK press release, a 2007 bureau speech (export value above HK$95.7 billion, second largest, expressly including re-exports) and a 2017 speech (second largest counting re-exports) are now facts — differing in year and basis, not interchangeable, and not a yearly series (see /calibre#toy-exporter-ranking); Toy Street likewise appears only in official 2016 speeches (as Tai Yuen Street, Wan Chai), with no shop count. On quarries the clearest official statement reaches only July 2018 — Lam Tei Quarry in Tuen Mun the only one still operating — with no later count or licensing list and no output series; local timber and firewood output has no official statistic at all and is never filled by guesswork. These were checked chapter by chapter in the Hong Kong Yearbook 2024 (Chapter 13, Commerce and Economic Development, carries only toy safety legislation and inspection figures; Chapter 15, Planning, Lands and Development, only underground quarrying studies and the Lam Tei pilot site), across the GovHK “Hong Kong: The Facts” series, in CEDD’s annual and environmental reports, and through the government-wide site search (www.search.gov.hk, restricted to official sites): none of them gives a year-by-year toy series, a count of surviving quarries and their licensing status, or timber and firewood output. The yearly export values, factory counts and employment series of textiles and garments are still uncompiled.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-21農業同漁業：官方冇兩業分開嘅逐年僱員序列。現有嘅係四組單一時點數字：漁護署〈香港的農業〉頁「現時本港約有 2 500 個農場，直接僱用約 4 300 個農民和工人」；〈香港捕撈漁業概況〉頁「現時香港約有 4 980 艘漁船，並估計有約 10 120 名從事捕魚作業的本地漁民」（2025 年，只計捕魚作業）；年報「本地漁民約 10 180 名」（2024 年）同「漁農業合計直接僱用 17 759 人」（2024 年）。四者時點同範圍都唔同，一律唔可以相加或相減（見 /calibre#farm-fishery-employment）；漁船數目另有兩套官方數字（年底領牌 6 125 艘對作業漁船約 4 980 艘，見 /calibre#fishing-vessel-counts）。農產方面，官方只公布產值、每日平均產量同本地供應比例，冇蔬菜、鮮花、豬、家禽以外嘅逐年產量；「捕撈量」同「養殖量」各自嘅逐年分項細數亦冇公布；本地供應比例兩個官方版本（漁護署頁面小數一位、政府一站通便覽整數）唔可以混用（見 /calibre#farm-local-supply-share）。
  Agriculture and fisheries: no year-by-year employment series broken down by sector is published. Four single-reference-point figures do exist: the AFCD page’s present-tense “about 2,500 farms directly employing about 4,300 farmers and workers”; the AFCD capture-fisheries page’s “about 4,980 fishing vessels and about 10,120 local fishermen” (2025, fishing operations only); and the yearbook’s about 10,180 local fishermen (2024) and 17,759 persons directly employed in agriculture and fisheries combined (2024). They differ in both scope and date and are never added or subtracted (see /calibre#farm-fishery-employment); vessel counts also come in two official versions (6,125 licensed at the year end against about 4,980 working the fisheries — see /calibre#fishing-vessel-counts). On output, official sources give values, daily averages and local supply shares but no year-by-year tonnage beyond vegetables, flowers, pigs and poultry, and no yearly sub-totals separating capture from culture output; the two official versions of the local supply ratios (AFCD to one decimal place, the GovHK factsheet in whole numbers) must not be mixed (see /calibre#farm-local-supply-share).
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-22無障礙出行：港鐵逐站設施、車站電話同無障礙洗手間位置照運輸署《殘疾人士公共交通指南》表一原文照錄。邊卡邊道門要喺港鐵 MTR Mobile「快捷出站」按該次出口查（同一個站，唔同出口可以係唔同卡）；每月開放資料表只有設施有無同出入口編號，冇車卡欄，所以本站唔會抄成固定「第 N 卡」。官方洗手間表未列出嘅站一律標示「官方表未列出」，唔會講「冇」。
  Accessibility: per-station facilities, station phone numbers and accessible-toilet locations are recorded verbatim from Table 1 of the Transport Department guide. The car and door come from MTR Mobile Fast Exit for that exit (the same station can need a different car for a different exit). The monthly open-data table has facilities and exit letters only, with no car column, so this site does not freeze a “carriage N”. Stations absent from the official toilet table are marked “not listed”, never “none”.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-23無障礙出行（視障／聽障設施嘅「部分」）：官方指南「為視障／聽障乘客提供的設施」兩節裡面，有幾條只講「部分」而唔列站別或列車數目——例如「部分港鐵站的售票機、增值機、無障礙洗手間和升降機…設有點字板」（官方冇列邊幾個站）、以及閃燈路線圖同動感行車路線圖喺觀塘線、港島線只屬「部分列車」（官方冇講幾多列）。呢類「部分」一律照官方講「部分」，本站唔會代官方補上站名或比例；要逐一坐實就要向港鐵索取逐站／逐列車安裝清單。另外，官方逐字列出「觸覺車站佈置圖」嘅站／線清單，但冇講其餘站係「未有」抑或「計劃中」——所以本站只講「官方清單未列」，唔會推斷。
  Accessibility (the “some” wording for visually and hearing impaired passengers): several bullets in the official chapter-2 lists say only “some” without enumerating stations or train sets — for example braille plates on ticket machines, add value machines, accessible toilets and lifts in certain MTR stations (no station list), and flashing system maps and active line diagrams on only “some trains” of the Kwun Tong and Island lines (no proportion). This site keeps the official “some” and never substitutes station names or percentages of its own; pinning these down requires a station-by-station and train-by-train installation list from MTR. The guide also names the stations and lines with tactile station layout maps but does not say whether the remaining stations have none or have plans — so this site says only “not named in the official list” and never infers.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-24無障礙出行（營辦商聯絡資料）：官方指南第五章逐間列出各公共運輸機構同復康巴士營運機構嘅電話、傳真、網址同電子郵箱（本站逐頁睇官方渲染圖核讀，中文頁同對面英文頁逐格核對）。呢啲係查詢渠道——官方冇講各營辦商嘅接聽安排、回覆時限、有無手語或文字查詢支援，亦冇列營辦商辦事處地址（只有顧客服務中心位置），所以本站唔會代官方補；需要呢類資料要直接向營辦商或運輸署查詢。
  Accessibility (operator contacts): the official fifth chapter lists each public transport operator’s and Rehabus operator’s telephone number, fax number, website and e-mail address (read here page by page from the official renderings, checked cell by cell against the facing English page). These are enquiry channels: the guide does not state call-handling arrangements, response times, or sign-language or text enquiry support, and gives no operator office addresses (only customer-service-centre locations), so none of that is supplied here; such details must be sought from the operator or the Transport Department directly.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source
• gap-25無障礙出行（鐵路以外）：官方指南只講「大部分」碼頭同船隻有無障礙設施，冇逐條渡輪航線、逐條巴士路線或逐個口岸列細節（例如邊條航線有無障礙洗手間、邊條巴士線用低地台車）；低地台專線小巴同的士電召台係有時點嘅官方清單，之後嘅加減要查運輸署最新公布。限制區上落車證明書嘅聯絡機構另有兩套官方數目——第四章正文講嘅間數同表二逐列編號嘅列數唔一致，官方文件冇交代差額原因，兩個數並列、唔可以互換或相加（見 /calibre#restricted-zone-certificate-contacts）；申請資格、證明書樣式、處理時間同有效期官方亦冇以文字交代。
  Accessibility (non-rail): the official guide says “most” piers and vessels and does not go route by route, bus route by bus route or control point by control point (for example which ferry has an accessible toilet, or which bus route deploys low-floor buses). The low-floor minibus and taxi call-station lists are dated official snapshots; later changes must be checked against the Transport Department. The restricted-zone certificate has two official counts of contact organisations — the number stated in the fourth chapter does not match the number of numbered rows in the guide’s table — and the document does not explain the difference, so both are published side by side and must not be swapped or added (see /calibre#restricted-zone-certificate-contacts); eligibility, the certificate design, processing time and validity are likewise not stated in text.
  有官方來源？回報此項 / Report an official source

自行核對

Check this yourself

• gaps.json：已知缺口清單（官方只有 PDF／新聞稿、口徑未核實），逐項原因同官方入口。
• 驗證政策：每一類數字由邊支自動閘負責、邊啲資料唔會當統計數字發布（本站唔要求人手核對）。
• 編輯方法：收錄規則、數字口徑、兩層職業條目的分別。
• catalog.json：全部條目的標題、摘要、時點同來源，一部機器可讀的索引。
• archive.json：志錄（《香港志》原子事實）規模、逐年網址、最新條目同全文檢索入口。
• fixtures.json：賽馬賽期表（官方逐月賽期）嘅逐季摘要、逐月賽日數、現行馬季餘下賽期、官方取消公告同賽期變動記錄。
• champions.json：國際賽事冠軍史（官方賽果頁）嘅逐屆冠軍（官方賽事名、途程、級別、三甲、騎師、練馬師）同本站點算嘅騎師／練馬師榜。
• awards.json：綠色企業名錄（官方獎項得獎名單）嘅逐界別得獎機構、官方級別、年份同中英文名。
• /chronicle/articles：《香港志》部類專題文章書目索引（只列官方標題同連結，唔收內文）。
• /chronicle/ancient：1841 年開埠之前嘅遠古／古代時間軸（時代分節、公元前年份照原文），數字可以逐項核對。
• sources.json：來源登記冊本身。
• llms.txt：給其他語言模型用的入口，同埋「只可以引用有來源數字」嘅指示。
• 問香港紀事館：對話檢索只會用已核對條目作答，未收錄就明講。

If an official primary source disagrees with this site, the primary source wins and the repo should be corrected.